Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Introduction to Logic - Ch. 5b

(Originally written December 6, 2006 in Book 9)

Introduction to Logic
Harry J. Gensler

Chapter 5: Basic Quantificational Logic

Quantificational Logic concerned with arguments whose valid depends on "all", "no", "some", and similar notions.

5.1 Easier Translations

Ir - Romeo is Italian
Ix - x is Italian
(x)Ix - For all x, x is Italian
(∃x)Ix - For some x, x is Italian

Capital letters are used for general terms or categories.

Small letters are used for singular terms or specific things or particulars.


  • Single capital letters denote statements = S
  • Capital letters followed by a small letter denote a general term = Ir
  • Capital letters followed by two or more small letters denote a relation = Lrj
  • a small letter can stand as either a constant or a variable
A quantifier is a sequence in the form of either:
1) (x)
2) (∃x)

(x) is a universal quantifier. It claims that the formula that follows is true for all values of x. i.e. 
(x)Ix - for all x, x is Italian (All are Italian)

(∃x) is an existential quantifier. It claims that the formula that follows is true for at least one value of x. i.e.
(∃x)Ix - for some x, x is Italian. (Some are Italian)

English - Quantificational Language

all (every) - (x)
not all (not every) - ~(x)
some - (∃x)
no - ~(∃x)

All A is B - (x)(Ax⊃Bx)
Some A is B - (∃x)(Ax·Bx)
No A is B - ~(∃x)(Ax·Bx)

5.2 Easier Proofs

Reverse squiggle rule

~(x)Fx - (∃x)~Fx
~(∃x)Fx - (x)~Fx

Existential Instantiation 
(∃x)Fx - Fa

The variable 'x' is substituted as the constant 'a'. 'a' is a hypothetical reality.

When there is more than one existential quantifier: i.e.
(∃x)Mx
(∃x)Fx

More than one hypothetical must be used: i.e.
(∃x)Mx - Ma
(∃x)Fx - Fb

Universal Instantiation 

Since (x)Fx states all x is Fx any constant can be instantiated. Thus if a problem looks like this:
(x)Fx - Fa
(x)Rx - Ra
(x)Gx - Ga
(x)Lx - La

Since it is universal it is true (or false) for all.

In doing a proof the order now looks like this:
1. asm: the opposite of the conclusion
2. reverse squiggle
3. existential instantiation 
4. universal instantiation

No comments:

Post a Comment