Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - James Joyce

Oh boy. What a grind it was to finish this one. First of all, there is no denying that this is truly a phenomenal book with incredible insights and Joyce does an amazing job of putting you into the story as a fly on the wall who can use every sense to imagine being in the story. We see, hear, feel, taste and smell alongside Stephen Dedalus. Secondly, I find much of Stephen Dedalus to be extremely boring. That may be sacrilegious, but I fear and fear not the repercussions of that sentence.

After I finished the book I did some reading and found that Joyce had originally submitted this as a treaty on Aesthetics. I found his take on aesthetics to be interesting. "-Art, said Stephen, is the human disposition of sensible or intelligible matter for an esthetic end" (Joyce, 207). In fact, Stephen's entire conversation with Lynch about art, aesthetics and beauty is fascinating. His contention that beauty should create a stasis between pity and terror rather than a kinetic emotion is an interesting and dispassionate notion. I think it is wrong, but it is at the very least thought provoking. His take on false art producing kinetic emotions like desire and loathing is something to take into account. Sadly, his attempt to get his thoughts on aesthetics was unpublished and he housed it in this semi-autobiographical tale that had more boring parts than interesting ones. I guess he accomplished his goal and left me in sort of a stasis, offering few kinetic emotions about his book. 

One of the few times I felt kinetic emotion was during the retreat section when the priests were calling for repentance so that no soul would suffer eternal damnation. In my mind's eye I recalled terrifying sermons from the retired senior pastor who gave such terrifying images of hellfire and brimstone I prayed nightly to escape such a fate. Tears and stress overtook me overtime he preached this message and I can't imagine hell much scarier than as he put it. I empathized with Stephen as he struggled with repenting and the notion that he had done to much to escape this terrible fate. "What did it avail to pray when he knew that his soul lusted after its own destruction?" (Joyce, 103-104). I understand that line on a visceral level. I also understand his wrestling with faith throughout the book, though I find my ending point to be vastly different than that of Stephen's. 

I found that like Daumal in A Night of Serious Drinking Joyce also sends a jab to the nose of reason. While Daumal called reason the off-loading of the responsibility to think, Joyce calls reason a pollutant. "A phrase of Cornelius Agrippa flew through his mind and then there flew hither and tither shapeless thoughts from Swedenborg on the correspondence of birds to things of the intellect and of how the creatures of the air have their knowledge and know their times and seasons because they, unlike man are in the order of their life and have not perverted that order by reason" (Joyce, 224-225).

Joyce unleashes a stinging attack on Protestantism in the back end of the book. Much of this book houses an Irish history that I don't fully know and can't fully know. It concerns self-rule and the religious trappings of a Protestant-Catholic war that has obvious political overtones. But, I do, even as someone who isn't Catholic understand his criticism of the disorganized way in which protestantism worships and structures there fragmented theological opinions. "I said that I had lost the faith, Stephen answered, but not that I had lost selfrespect. What kind of liberation would that be to forsake an absurdity which is logical and coherent and to embrace one which is illogical and incoherent?" (Joyce, 243-244). I don't agree that faith is necessarily an absurdity nor do I find Protestantism illogical. But, I do find and struggle with the fact that Protestantism is so incoherent and crave some of the symmetry and logically soundness behind Catholicism. 

Lastly, I found this line to be sadly beautiful in its composition and meaning. "The past is consumed in the present and the present is living only because it brings forth the future" (Joyce, 251). I find that restlessness and striving to be endearing, but also wearying. 

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Beyond Good & Evil 20 - 185

(Originally written August 8, 2007 in Book 16)

Beyond Good & Evil
Friedrich Nietzsche

20

All philosophical concepts are intertwined. No one discovers anything new any more, they only come back to an idea long forgotten. It is a remembering of sorts.

21

The "cause sui" is the greatest conceived self-contradiction.

"The desire for 'freedom of the will' in the superlative metaphysical sense... [is] the desire to bear the entire and ultimate responsibility, and to absolute God, the world, ancestors, chance and society" (Nietzsche, 218).

We ought to use cute and effect only as pure concepts (fictional conveniences) for the purpose of communication. We ought not to use them for explanatory purposes.

By using cause and effect in explanations we impose our way of thinking to the thing itself and speak only mythologically.

Free will, un-free will, cause and effect, are simply mythology. "in real life it is only a matter of strong and weak wills" (Nietzsche, 219).

22

The conformity of nature to laws is merely interpretation.

One can use this interpretation in any way he wishes, but it remains nonetheless an interpretation.

23

We must sail over morality and immorality to life itself.

The path to this is true psychology.

Psychology is the path to fundamental problems.

Part Two: The Free Spirit

24

The will to knowledge is on the foundation of the will to ignorance. We stay ignorant because we desire the freedom it gives.

25

Beware of defending the "truth" or your theories because no philosopher has been proven right.

Rather than striving for truth, strive for masks and subtlety so "that you may be mistaken for what you are not, or feared a little" (Nietzsche, 226).

When you defend your theories you simply become a vengeance seeker.

26

"Cynicism is the only form in which base souls approach honesty; and the higher man must listen closely to every coarse or subtle cynicism, and congratulate himself when a clown without shame or a scientific satay speaks out precisely in front of him" (Nietzsche, 228).

Indignant people are people not worth listening to because no one lies more than the indignant.

27

Do things in a way that is difficult to understand. That way those friends who laugh and misunderstand can be gotten rid of with a laugh.

28

A writers tempo of style is dictated by his language and culture and translating it to other languages can make the good intentioned translation a caricature of the original.

What Nietzsche admired most about Plato and what drew him to read Plato was Plato's secrecy and sphinx nature.

29

"Independence is for the very few, it is a privilege of the strong" (Nietzsche, 231). Those who seek it are also daring to the point of recklessness.

30

Man's highest insights must (and should) sound like follies or crimes.

That which serves the higher soul is poison to the lower.

"The virtues of the common man might perhaps signify vices and weaknesses in a philosopher" (Nietzsche, 232).

Books for the whole world are foul and small people cling to them. "One should not go to church if one wants to breathe pure air" (Nietzsche, 233).

31

The youthful soul is reckless and pursues without art. Then they add art to their arguments. Then they, after feeling disappointments turn against themselves. Ten years later we realize that this was all still youthful.

32

During prehistoric times the value of an action was judged on its consequences. This is the pre-moral period of history.

The first step into the moral history of the world is knowing thyself.

Now actions are valued or devalued on their origin or the actor's intention.

We ought to have a shift in value judgments to the extra-moral.

The intent of an action is merely a sign or a symptom and requires interpretation.

Traditional morality is merely a prejudice, something that must be overcome.

33

The whole morality of self-sacrifice must be questioned because it is a seduction.

It seduces by making one feel good. Those who are self-sacrificial reap the benefits, therefore we must be cautious.

34

The faith in immediate certainties is a moral naïveté that reflects honor or philosophers.

Apart from morality this faith is stupidity.

It is nothing more than a prejudice that makes us believe that the truth is moe valuable than mere appearance.

Why must true and false be opposites? Why can't we just admit that they are just lighter and darker shadows and shades of appearance.

36

Thinking is merely a relation of our drives to one another.

37

?

38

Often times people interpret things with their own indignation on enthusiasm so much that the actual text is buried beneath the interpretation.

39

Happiness and virtue are not valid arguments to support doctrines. But unhappy and evil are not counter arguments.

The truth may be dangerous and harmful. "The strength of spirit should be measured according to how much of the 'truth' one could still barely endure" (Nietzsche, 239).

40

Shame is an invention of man.

Masks are necessary to any profound man. The most profound man has a mask that is constantly growing.

41

We should be independent, but we must test ourselves to make sure we are ready.

We should not be too attached to any person because every person is a prison.

He should not be too attached to our fatherland.

We should detach ourselves from pity.

We should not be so attached to a science.

We should not become attached to our detachment.

We should not become attached to any virtue, lest it become a vice.

"One must know how to conserve oneself: the hardest test of independence" (Nietzsche, 242).

42

The new philosophers will want to be riddles.

43

The new philosophers will be friends of truth, but they will not be dogmatists.

"It must offend their pride, also their taste, if their truth is supposed to be a truth for everyman" (Nietzsche, 243).

44

The new philosophers will be free spirits.

Free spirits are not those democratic spirits who are calling for an equality of all men. They merely want to make life easier for the herd and abolish all suffering whatsoever, as if suffering served no purpose.

The democratic spirit, heralded as a "free spirit" is actually a spirit in bondage. It is a spirit that visits to chain all spirits together and therefore chain them all, even the exceptional owes to the ground.

TO be a truly strong and free spirit it must grow under extreme pressure.

The free spirit believes that the evil, devilry, hardness, stoicism, forcefulness, slavery and beast-like qualities in man serve to enhance him as much as the opposites do.

Free spirits are not the most communicative ones. Free spirits are not the same as free thinkers.

The free spirit has faced himself from all prisons or nooks, from prejudice, youth, origin and accident from all lures like honor, money, offices and enthusiasm of the senses because they contain hidden dependencies.

With of these restraint the free spirit is uninhabited and can stomach the unstomachable, digest the undigestible, view the unviewable, and penetrate the impenetrable.

Free-spirits are friends of solitude.

Part Three: What is religious

45

In order to know anything, one must do a lot of work to know, and then it usually amounts to a few things.

"But a curiosity of my type remains after all the most agreeable of all vices - sorry, I meant to say: the love of truth has its reward in heaven and even on earth" (Nietzsche, 250).

46

"The Christian faith is a sacrifice: all freedom, all pride, all self-confident of the spirit; at the same time, enslavement and self-mockery, self-mutiliation" (Nietzsche, 250).

Slaves are people who love as they hate: without nuance, to pain even! It is under these conditions that Christianity has appealed to so many. But, the complete lack of suffering in the masters (i.e. stoicism and skepticism) enraged the suffering Christian slaves and they overthrew their masters.

47

Wherever religion has popped up three things have followed:
1) Solitude
2) Fasting
3) Sexual abstinence

48

In Catholicism unbelief is seen as a rebellion against the spirit whereas Northern Protestantism sees unbelief as a return to spirit.

49

The Greek religion was noble because it affirms life despite the terrors of it. But when fear became an integral part of religion it paved the way for Christianity.

50

There are various types of passion for God:
- Peasant: sincere and obtrusive (ala Luther)
- Oriental- a slave who has been pardoned and elevated (a la Augustine)

51

The most powerful men bow before a saint because as they honor a saint they honor something in themselves.

They bow because a sight of a saint arouses superstition in them.

It was the "will to power" of the saint that struck fear in their hearts.

52

The Jewish Old Testament contains things so grand that Greek and Indian literature has nothing to compare with it.

The Old Testament is the book of divine justice, the New Testament is the book of grace.

The New Testament is a book for small souls and dogmatists. The pairing of the grand Old Testament and the small soul New Testament is the greatest sin against the spirit of literary Europe.

53

The European religious instinct is growing more and more powerful, but the faith in theism grows dimmer and dimmer.

54

"Modern philosophy, being an epistemological skepticism is, covertly an overtly anti-Christian - although, to say this for the benefit of more refined ears, by no means anti-religious" (Nietzsche, 256).

55

"There is a great ladder of religious cruelty with many rungs, but three of these are the most important" (Nietzsche, 257)

1. The sacrifice of human beings (especially one's loved ones) to a god
2. The sacrifice of one's nature (asceticism)
3. The sacrifice of God for nothing

56

Whoever thinks through pessimism thoroughly will come out at the end beyond morals, beyond good and evil.

He will come out the most-spirited, alive and affirming human ever.

57

One day the concepts of "God" and "sin" (the most trouble causing concepts of all time) will be viewed as a child's toy.

58

The genuinely religious life requires a life of leisure, or an aristocratic air to it.

The religious life is most fond of self-examination.

The modern world, with its busyness and stupid pride educate man for unbelief.

Every age has its naïveté, ours is the naïveté of the scholars' belief in his own superiority.

59

Those who wish to see life transcendentalized are those who have had inter lives spoiled the most.

It has been an incurable pessimism that has forced men to cling to a religious interpretation of existence. It has been fear that has drove man to religion.

Piety is the most subtle offspring of the fear of truth.

60

TO love men for God's sake is the most noble feeling attained by men.

61

The philosopher should use religion (as well as politics and economics) to cultivate and educate.

The philosopher can use religion to train people differently. Religion is used differently for those who rule and those who are ruled.

"To ordinary human beings, finally - the vast majority who exist for service and general advantage, and who may exist only for that -" (Nietzsche, 263). (Wow.)

Religion is a tool to subject the people for rules.

For those who are ruled, religion is a refreshment, a sanctification and justification of their suffering.

62

One always pays dearly when religions do not want to be used as a tool for education in philosopher's hands.

When religions insist on being sovereign in their own right, when they see themselves as ends and not means, people suffer terribly.

Religions preserve the weak and aid the suffering so that the natural selection process is destroyed. Religions weaken the human race.

Christianity is an arrogance. It is a hubris, a denial of rank in men. It is the pronouncement of the weak that they are strong. It is a complete flipping of truth.

Christianity has transformed man into a herd animal.

Part Four: Epigrams and Interludes

63: A teacher only takes things seriously in relation to his students, including himself.

64

Knowledge for its own sake is the last snare of morality

65

"The attraction of knowledge would be small if one did not have to overcome so much shame on the way" (Nietzsche, 269).

65a

One is most dishonest to one's god.

66

To let himself be taken advantage of could be the modesty of a god among men.

67

The love one is barbarism because it is done so at the expense of others. Likewise, love of God is barbarism.

68

The memory yields to one's pride (Freudian theory of repression)

69

One is mistaken if one doesn't believe that some killing is done considerately.

70

Life is repetitive. If one has character, one has experience.

71

"As long as you still experience the stars as something as 'above you' you lack the eye of knowledge" (Nietzsche, 270).

72

It is the duration, not the intensity of high feelings that make high men.

73

Whoever reaches his ideal transcends it.

73a

People can hide their glory from others and call that their pride.

74

A man with spirit is unbearable without gratitude and cleanliness.

75

"The degree and kind of a man's sexuality reach up into the ultimate pinnacle of his spirit" (Nietzsche, 271).

76

A warlike man sets upon himself in peace.

77

One wishes to bully, justify, scold, honor or hide one's habits with his principles.

78

"Whoever despises himself still respects himself as one who despises" (Nietzsche, 271).

79

A soul which is loved but does not love betrays itself.

80

A matter that becomes clear no longer interprets us. What happens when we pursue and complete the Socratic maxim of "know thyself?"

81

"It is terrible to die of thirst in the ocean. Do you have to salt your truth so heavily that it does not ever quench thirst anymore? (Nietzsche, 271).

82

Pity for all means tyranny for you.

83: ?

84

Women learn to hate to the extent to which her charms diminish.

85

"The same affects in man and woman are yet different in tempo, therefore man and woman do not cease to misunderstand each other" (Nietzsche, 272).

86

Women hate the "woman" (concept, universal)

87

If one imprison's one's heart one can free one's spirit.

88

We mistrust clever people when they become embarrassed.

89

Terrible experiences pose the question if the experiencer is not terrible.

90

Heavy-spirited people are made light by love and hate (whereas others become weighted with these)

91

Those who are so cold they burn cause some to believe they glow.

92

"Who has not, for the sake of his good reputation - sacrificed himself once?" (Nietzsche, 273).

93: ?

94 Maturity consists of finding the seriousness one had as a child at play.

95

To be ashamed one's immorality is to be on the path to be ashamed of one's morality.

96

One should part from life as Odysseus left Nausica: blessing it rather than loving it.

97

A great man is merely an actor of his own ideal.

98

Our conscience, if trained right, kisses us while hurting us.

99

The voice of disappointment is listening for an echo but only hearing praise.

100

We see ourselves as simpler than we are to take a rest from others

101

The knowledgeable man may feel like "God become animal"

102

Discover that one loves you back should disgust you because the person is stupid enough to love you back

103 ?

104

The importance of Christians' love for man is what has ceased their boring people at the stake. If they were truly concerned with men they would burn heretics and false prophets still.

105

The salvation via deception is implantable for the free spirit.

106

"In music the passions enjoy themselves" (Nietzsche, 274).

107

The sign of strong character is making up your mind and standing by it without regard to the best counter argument, therefore it is occasionally a will to stupidity.

108

There is no such thing as moral phenomena, only moral interpretation of phenomena.

109

A criminal is often unequal to his crime

110

The lawyers of criminals are often not artful enough to turn his beautiful terribleness into an advantage.

111

The vanity is most impenetrable right after the pride has been wounded

112

Those who feel predestined to see and not believe will fend off all believers

113: ?

114

The enormous expectation in sexual love and sense of shame in this expectation spoils all perspective for women

115

When neither love nor hate is involved, a women's game is mediocre

116

The great epochs of life occur when we have guts enough to rechristen our evil as what is best in us

117

The will to overcome an affect is merely the will of some other affect

118

Admiration is an innocence that people don't realize that they too may some day be admired

119

The disgust with dirt may cause us to not clean ourselves or "justify" ourselves

120

"Sensuality often hastens the growth of love so much that there roots remain weak and are easily torn up" (Nietzsche, 276).

121

It was subtle of God to learn Greek and not to learn it well

122

Enjoying praise can be a courtesy of the heart (the opposite of vanity)

123

"Even concubinage has been corrupted - by marriage" (Nietzsche, 276).

124

Whoever rejoices on the stake triumphs over the absence of pain that he expected, not over pain itself.

125

When we are forced to change our minds about a person we hold the inconvenience against him.

126

A people is a detour to get to six or seven great men (and then around them).

127

Science offends the modesty of real women. It makes them curious about their bodies

128

 The more abstract the truth, the more seduction is needed to teach it.

129

The devil deeps away from God the farthest, therefore the devil is the most ancient friend of wisdom

130

A man betrays himself when his talent decreases. Talent is finery; finery is a hiding place.

131

Men and women deceive themselves about one another. At bottom they love only themselves (or their own ideal).

132

"One is best punished for one's virtues" (Nietzsche, 278).

133

Those who cannot live their ideal live more frivolously than those without an ideal.

134

All credibility and evidence of truth is derived from the senses

135 - ?

136

One seeks a midwife for his thoughts to begin a good conversation

137

A remarkable scholar is often a mediocre man. A mediocre artist is often a remarkable man.

138

We do what we do in dreams and awake: we invent who we are are and then forget him

139

"In revenge and love women is more barbarous than man" (Nietzsche, 278).

140 ?

141

The abdomen is why man doesn't easily mistake himself for a god.

142

"'In true love it is the soul that envelopes the body's' are the chastest words ever spoken"

143 Our vanity wishes that what we do best is what is hardest for us; therefore, the origin of morality

144

When a woman has scholarly inclinations there is probably something wrong with her sexuality.

145

Woman would not have the genius for finery if she didn't' instinctively have a secondary role.

146

Whoever fights monsters must not himself become a monster. The abyss stares at you when you stare at it.

147?

148

Woman are unequaled in seducing their neighbor into believing something and then believing piously in this opinion.

149

What a time experiences as evil is what an anti time experienced as good.

150

What happens around a hero is tragedy. What happens around a demigod is a satyr play. What happens around God? The World?

151

Having talent is not enough. One must have permission for the talent

152

Where the tree of knowledge is, there is so paradise. At least that is what the serpents say.

153

Whatever is done from love is done from beyond good and evil.

154

The delight in mockery is healthy, everyone else is pathology.

155

The sense of tragic gains or falls in level of sensuality.

156

Madness is rare in individuals, often in groups.

157

The thought of suicide is comforting on troubling nights

158

Reason and conscience bow to the tyrant in us.

159

One must repay good and ill, but not necessarily to that person

160

One no longer loves his insight once he communicates it.

161

Poets exploit their experiences.

162

Every nation believes our neighbor is his, not ours

163

Love brings out what is rare and exceptional, it easily deceives his normalcy

164

Jesus said the law was for servants of God. Be sons of God! What are morals to us sons of God?

165 -?

166

"Even when the mouth lies, the way it looks tells the truth" (Nietzsche, 282).

167 In hard men, intimacy involves shame

168 Christianity turned Eros into a vice

169

Talking a lot about one's self may be a way to conceal one's self

170 "Praise is more obtrusive than a reproach" (Nietzsche, 282).

171

TO a man of knowledge, pity seems ridiculous

172

From love of man one embraces another randomly, but we must not tell them that

173 One doesn't hate as long as one despises, but then only those they esteem

174 Utilitarians only love things useful as a vehicle for personal inclinations

175 - One loves one's desires and not the desired

176 Others' vanity only offends us if it offends our vanity

177 Nobody has been truthful enough about truthfulness

178 One doesn't credit clever people with their follies

179 The consequences of our actions take hold of us, indifferent to how much we have improved because of them

180 There is an innocence in lying based on a dedication to a course

181 - It is inhuman to bless when cursed

182 ?

183 "Not that you lied to me, but that I no longer believe you, has shaken me" (Nietzsche, 287).

184 The spirits of kindness may be seen to be malice

185 I don't like him because I am not equal to him. Has any one said this?

Fin

02/08/07-08/13/07 Book 16

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Morality & Guilt in various religions

(Originally written April 11, 2007 in book 15)

Chapter 4 - Morality & Guilt

Some fundamental distinctions

There are many moral concepts that are universal to all religions.

Duties in Religion
1. Moral Norms
2. Religious Norms
A. Obligatory Actions
B. Ritual avoidances
i. Defilement of self
ii. Defilement of the Holy

The Common Core

There are similarities in moral codes from religion to religion, but upon closer examination they can be seriously different.

Some principles may seem similar like Thou Shall Not Kill of Judaism & Christianity and the principle of ahimsa - the 10 precepts of Buddhism. But, "Thou shall not kill" means do not murder, while ahimsa is no harming of life whatsoever.

Other principles are completely contrary from religion to religion. The second commandment, "Thou shall not bow down before any graven images" is contrary to the statues of Buddhas, an integral part of Buddhism. Ahimsa is contrary to the animal sacrifice of the Old Testament.

Religious and ethical considerations go hand in hand. An ethical concept of a religion cannot be isolated from the overall context of that religion.

The Ceremonial Dimension

Sin and defilement are very different. Sin (a breaking of a moral rule) involves intent, whereas defilement (a breaking of a ceremonial rule) completely disregards intent.

Moral, religious, and ceremonial concepts can be isolated only in theory. In practice they work hand in hand and no such distinction is found among practitioners.

Case in point: Christianity

Christianity is not an ethical religion like Judaism or Islam. It is a redemptive religion The heart of Christianity is not its moral code (it does have one) but a historical event leading to the salvation of men.

The Law within Christianity operates in a few ways:
1) It governs life so that life is actually livable.
2) It functions as a "schoolmaster" (Galatians 3:24). It prepares us for adoption into God's family. It shows us that we are incapable of earning admittance into God's family and that we can enter only by Grace.
3) The keeping of the law is only possible via the regenerative work of the Holy Spirit.

"Christian ethics apart from a Christian supernatural setting is pointless" (Corduan, 88).

Christian religion and Christian ethics are utterly and wholly intertwined. Without the theological underpinnings of Christianity all that is left is an impossible moral code.

From its inception Christianity ahas been against many of the ritual prohibitions that were integral parts of Jewish and Gentile societies.

The only occurrence of ceremonial purity in the New Testament is Paul's admonishment of the Corinthians' treatment of the Lord's supper (1 Corinthians 11:17-34).

Corduan believes that this admonition is not so much a command for personal holiness prior to partaking of Communion, but a mandate to understand communion correctly and to treat it with proper respect. Linehan feels that this is a ceremonial purity issue right now (subject to change of course).

Side not: It may not be a call to become personally holy before partaking communion because that would in fact deny the nature of communion, but a more inner ceremonial purity in being ready to partake of communion. As for what communion is I am not ready to give it the Catholic transubstantiation status, but neither do I want to reduce it to a mere remembrance of the event. I think it is a true partaking of something holy and not merely a remembrance of something holy.

In various aspects of Christendom throughout history some ceremonial purity has emerged, but is not a part of the New Testament.

Ethics in the religious universe

Judaism & Islam have similar ethical codes.

Judaism has a longer history and a much more detailed set of codes.

The moral codes function differently in Islam and Judaism. Adherence to the moral code in Judaism is an expression of the relationship between the Jew and YHWH whereas adherence to the moral code in Islam is the way to enter Heaven for the Muslim.

The standards of Judaism also apply solely to the Jews whereas the moral codes of Islam we taken as universally binding.

Zoroastrianism's moral code is similar to Islamic & Jewish codes. All three were revealed by God to a prophet (Zoroastrianism - Zoroaster, Islam - Muhammad, Judaism - Moses).

Zoroastrianism however is preoccupied with ceremonial purity more than ethical obligations.

In Indic religions (Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism) there is a two-tiered arrangement. Monks have stricter codes than the laity.

The Hindu code is hinged on the caste system. All ethical and moral obligations are tied to one's caste.

Hinduism also has duties associated with stages of life.

A man must become a sannyasin and renounce everything, his name, his family, his caste, etc. in order to achieve moksha (release, liberation).

The monks in Buddhism and Jainism are the only ones capable of release from the cycle of reincarnation. The laity can work to have a better rebirth, but cannot achieve nirvana.

Jainism is harshly ascetic. Eventually a monk will starve himself to achieve his goal.

Buddhism considers itself the "middle way" and is not as ascetic as Jainism.

Buddhism teaches that harsh asceticism can be a hinderance to spiritual enlightenment.

Confucianism is above all else a code of behavior.

Confucianism came to exist within other religions (Daoism/Buddhism in China, Shinto in Japan), not along side it.

Confucianism focuses on human behavior and teaches that proper individual behavior will alleviate societal problems.

Confucianism does not possess within itself any religious doctrine.

Violations and their Consequences

There are two major trajectories in the world's religions:
1) Western/Abrahamic Traditions
- Judaism
- Zoroastrianism
- Islam
- Baha'i
- Christianity

2) Eastern/Indic Traditions
- Hinduism
- Buddhism
- Jainism
- Sikhism
- Daoism

These two groups differ radically on the conception of sin.

In Abrahamic religions sin is an offending of God and breaking the human-God relationship.

In Indic religion sin is a negative Karmic effect.

God is the source of moral rules in monotheistic traditions.

The character of moral law is prescriptive and proscriptive, not descriptive in Abrahamic traditions.

Punishment occurs after sin in the West. It could be a warning, salutary, or be a making of an example out of the person.

Punitive action results out of a decree of a personal God. A personal God can also provide mercy or grace to the sinner.

Sin in the Indic traditions is similar to breaking a natural law.

Indic religions have the concept of Karma, which is not tied to a personal God.

In Hinduism, Karma is tied to Samsara, the cycle of rebirths. One's present life is the result of one's previous life.

Karma is not deterministic or fatalistic in Hinduism. One controls one's karma.

Karma is automated in Hinduism. It is not (usually) a judgment passed by a deity.

Karma is negative and pessimistic. It is viewed as perpetual suffering.

The goal of Hinduism is not to accumulate good karma, but to escape the samsara cycle.

There can be a divine intervention in samsara and karma. This is what the Bhagavad Gita tells Hindus.

The negative aspect of karma is even more noticeable in Buddhism and Jainism.

Buddha taught that there is no individual soul and that each person's an aggregate of effects.

Good karma in Buddhism is karma nonetheless and must be balanced out in another life. The goal is to have no karma at all.

In Jainism, Karma is a dust that accumulates on one's soul.

Only a complet abnégation of life leads to release from samsara.

The goal of a Jain monk is to do nothing and to starve himself to death.

Sin belongs within the framework of a system with a personal God. Karma fits into a framework without a personal deity much better.

Christianity alone possesses the notion of "original sin". At first blush this can appear similar to karma in that everyone is born into a state of condemnation through no fault of our own.

The major misunderstanding with original sin is to tie it to finitude. Our finitude makes it impossible not to sin is a common erroneous belief.

Christ proved that human being can live a sinless life.

Original Sin describes the broken relationship between man and God, not the introduction of finitude.

Healing the Breach

Ronal M. Green distinguishes between four senses of reason
1) Theoretical reason - our conceptualization of the world around us
2) Prudential reason - our capacity for living successfully in the world as we understand it
3) Moral reason - places our priorities in order
4) Religious reason - attempts to reconcile the conflict between prudential and moral reason

Response to the World Parliament Statement

Only the most minimal code seems to be fairly universal (truth-property-life-sex) and even these must not be abstracted from their religious context lest they become equivocations and meaningless.

The statement, originally by Hans Küng calls for an end to prejudice and hate. This is all well and good unless it denies objective truth on matters like abortion and homosexuality. Many Christians are labeled as bigots for their stances on these issues.

Likewise, Küng demands that religions denounce their fundamentalists because they deny peace among religions and without religious peace there can be no world peace. But this world be a denouncement of objective truth on many vital issues.

The 1997 Declaration of a Global Ethic affirms an universal moral code and locates it where it ought to be, within a religious context. But, it does not give any implementation strategy and leave evangelical Christians in a place where they cannot agree with it without giving away too much.


Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Original Monotheism Notes

Originally written March 27, 2007 in Book 15

Christian Presuppositions

1. The Authority of Scripture
2. The historical Christ
3. Mediation through Christ's atonement
4. Faith
- cognitive dimension of faith
- faith involves trust

Models of Relationship

Model 1: Complete Continuity

One way of looking at Christianity in comparison to other religions is to regard all religion as interwoven Christianity is distinctive in this model but, not more so than any other religion.

John Hick uses this model. He held that all religions are responses to an ultimate transcendent reality.

Hick believes all religions are equally imperfect in their ways of relating to the ultimate transcendent reality because "the Real" is beyond human concepts.

Model 2: Complete Discontinuity

Christianity shares nothing with other religions. And it is separate in every category.

J.A. DiNoia believes all religions are equally unique. He held that each religion exists in its own context and shows no similarity.

Karl Barth conceived of Christianity as being wholly unique from all other religions to the point where he felt it but to not consider Christianity as a religion.

He held all religions to be a human attempt to establish themselves as their own god.

Model 3: Certainty on the basis of superiority and inferiority

This model allows for all religions to be categorically similar while one religion can possess more truth.

The Catholic Church believes in a hierarchy of received grace from the God.

From top to bottom:

1. The Church
2. Orthodox & Protestants
3. Jews
4. Muslims
5. Polytheists & Animists
6. Moral Atheists

The Catholic Church has the most grace while the Moral Atheist has the least grace.

Model 4: Discontinuity on the whole with some commonalities

Christianity is categorically different from all other religions, but there is some overlap in some areas.

General Revelation and Original Monotheism

Christianity is both unique and not unique. In some ways Christianity is discontinuous with other religions, while it shares features with other religions.

Christianity is based on specific revelation: the Word of God and the person of Christ. But there is revelation outside of Christianity's specific revelation.

Two types of revelation:

- General Revelation - God is known via nature
- Special Revelation - God's direct self-disclosure to man.

The idea that God has persisted throughout the history of mankind is "original monotheism".

Precursor-non-Theistic Theories

In the 19th Century it was assumed that religions evolved alongside mankind. During the 20th century this assumption was largely abandoned.

Origin theories of Religion

- Celestial Phenomena: Religion began with deifying heavenly bodies.
- Natural Phenomena: Religion arose with endowing personhood on natural occurrences
- Manism - Religion began with venerating on deceased human beings
- Manaism - "Mana" is a power that human beings can tap into for magical energy. "mana" belief is the root of all religion.
- Magic: Magic was the origin of all religion.
-Totemism - Religion originated on the societal level.
- Animism - Religion began with the recognition of personal spirits (both natural and ancestral)

Problems with evolutionary theories of religion

1. Identifying which are truly the oldest human cultures so that the equivalence between oldest culture and oldest religion can be drawn.
 - evolutionary theory arguments are often circular

2. Distinguishing between the rule and the exception
- Shaky data was used to support shaky theories

3. Allowing the theory to dictate the data
- Most of the theories had a philosophical or sociological background rater than an observational one.

Lang and Other Early Theories of Original Monotheism

Anthropology discovered that many preliterate cultures had a singular creator god who lived int the sky.

This sky god seemed to have many of the qualities associated with the monotheistic god.

Since the monotheistic God was seen as the top of the evolutionary process it was troublesome for the evolutionary theory that such primitive cultures would have such an evolved god.

Andrew Lang promoted the theory that the origin of religion lies in the knowledge of the single creator god.

Wilhelm Schmidt and Ethnohistory

Schmidt provided an anthropological method for deciding the relative age of cultures called ethnohistory.

His theory dispensed of the notion of a single global evolution.

Schmidt's development among preliterate societies:

Primordial - hunter/gatherers

Primary -

1) Hunter (patrilineal and totemism)
2) Horticulturalists (Matrilineal and fertility oriented)
3) Nomadic cattle herders

Secondary - Agriculturalists

Tertiary - Ancient City Builders

Schmidt held that original monotheism is the most basic religion and other parts of religion like polytheism and spirit worship evolved as the society became more advanced.

Schmidt's Expressions of God:

1. God - there is one God, but there could be many spirits (who are not worshipped as God)
2. Father - God is the Father of all
3. Skydweller - God lives in a celestial place.
4. Creator - God made what exists.
5. Superior one - God is not human, he does not have a human body.
6. Everlasting one - God is not subject to time the way man is.
7. All-knowing one - God knows what we say or think
8. All-good one - God is good. God made the moral rules.
9. All powerful one - God is not limited in his power to do anything.

Original Monotheism & Revelation (40)

One-sixth done!


Friday, February 16, 2007

Chapter 4 - Pocket Guide to World Religions (B)

(Originally written February 16, 2007 in Book 14)

Christianity and Judaism split within the first generations of Christianity.

Life of Jesus Christ

Jesus was born in Bethlehem about 6 BC.

He was born to a virgin via a miraculous birth.

Virtually nothing about his life is known prior to age 30. At 30 he launched his public ministry. He gathered 12 disciples.

He emphasized servitude to God and men out of love, not obligation.

He claimed to be the Messiah and the Son of God. He was a miracle worker and an exorcist.

He was crucified for offending the Jewish establishment and suspected of treason against Rome.

The Scriptures claim that Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to his disciples over a 40-day period until finally ascending into Heaven.

Subsequent Developments

During the first 70 years after Jesus' death and resurrection his teachings spread throughout the Roman Empire.

Paul the Apostle was instrumental in these early years.

The New Testament books were written in this time too.

The Early Church was persecuted by the Roman Empire until 313 when Emperor Constantine declared Christianity a legal religion.

When the Roman Empire split tension between the Eastern Orthodox Church and Western Catholic Church arose. The Church finally split in 1054.

The bishop of Rome blame the Pope and asserted authority over all the Western Church between 350 - 850 AD.

Another major split occurred in the 16th century with the Protestant Reformation.

Currently, Christianity is characterized by two important features: first a global presence reaching into even the smallest corners of the world; and second, division into many different local churches and denominations, which often differ only on minor matters" (Corduan, 42).

Scriptures

Virtually all Christians recognize the Scriptures as two collections:
1) The Scriptures of Jesus' day (known as the Old Testament)
2) The New Testament

The Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches maintain that the Apocrypha are also inspired works and thus, Scriptures. Protestants do not hold this view because the Apocrypha was not recognized as Scripture in Jesus' day.

Major Beliefs

Christianity emphasizes correct belief.

1. God - one God who created the universe and is not part of the universe.
2. Trinity - God exists eternally in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Ghost. God is one nature, but three distinct persons.
3. Sin and Redemption - man is fallen and must redeemed
4. Christ - Jesus Christ is God. He became Incarnate.
5. Atonement - Jesus' death was not a martyrdom. It was the atonement for sinful man.
6. Faith - faith is an attitude of trust in Christ. Salvation is earned by faith alone, not through works.
7. Future - Jesus will come back to judge the earth. Those who believed will go to Heaven, those who did not will go to Hell.

Subgroups

Christianity is divided into numerous subgroups and sub-subgroups. Many have split over very minor doctrinal disagreements

Major Subgroups

1) Roman Catholic Church
- Headed by the Pope
- The Largest subgroup
- Worldwide
- Sacramental

2) Eastern Orthodox Church
- primarily in Greece, Eastern Europe and the Middle East
- Sacramental
- Has preserved many ancient traditions
- Headed by the Patriarch

3) Protestant Churches
- Emphasize individual salvation

Worship Practices

They vary from church to church, but usually have singing, scripture reading, prayer and preaching.

Some churches are liturgical, others are very informal.

Baptism and Communion are areas that have caused rifts in the Church.

Church Division: (among many others)



Baptism is the Christian initiation ceremony.

Communion is a ceremonial meal of a portion of bread and a sip of wine.

Some call these sacraments, others call them ordinances.

Sacraments -> conveying of God's grace.
Ordinances -> reminders of God's actions

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Philosophy of Religion - Hick: Ch. 5 (A)

(Originally written February 1, 2007 in Book 7)

Philosophy of Religion
John Hick

Chapter 5 - Revelation and Faith

It is impossible to establish the existence or non-existence of God via rational arguments proceeding from universally accepted premises.

Chris Linehan - An atheist can never convince a believer that God does not exist if he/she has truly felt God's touch/. But, a believer can never convince an atheist that God exists if he/she has naturalized all of his or her experience. God shows Himself to men and men must then interpret what they have seen.

Philosophy recognizes two ways in which human beings can come to know what may be known:
1) Experience (empiricism)
2) Reasoning (rationalism)

God must be known by experience. "If God exists, God is not an idea but a reality outside us; in order to be known to men and women, God must become manifest in some way within their experience" (Hick, 58).

Chris Linehan: I believe that God can be known solely by experience, but I think He can be known via reasoning. God is a logical necessity; thus, all we need to know is logic and necessity to know God.

The Bible takes God's existence for granted. There are no attempts to prove His existence.

The Biblical writers saw God as an experience reality, not an inferred entity.

God's disclosure of Himself to man is "revelation". Man's response to revelation is "faith".

The Propositional view of Revelation and Faith

Roman Catholicism and conservative Protestantism (as well as the Medieval conception) represent the propositional view of revelation. Revelation in this view is a body of truths expressed in statements and propositions. "Revelation is the imparting to people of divinely authenticated truths" (Hick, 60). Faith under this scheme is a person's obedient acceptance to these truths.

Natural theology and revealed theology have accompanied the propositional view of revelation and faith for centuries.

Natural theology is the sum of all theological truths that can be ascertained by humans without divine assistance. Revealed theology is the sum of truths that can be comprehended only with the assistance of the Divine.

Voluntarist Theories of Faith

Blaise Pascal and William James treat faith as the acceptance of certain beliefs by a deliberate act of will. Both Pascal and James saw it better to believe than not believe because it is so much worse to not believe in something that is true than believe in something that turns out to be false.

F.R. Tennant states that faith always involves risk, but it is via risk that human knowledge is increased.

Tillich's conception of Faith as ultimate concern

Paul Tillich taught, "Faith is the state of being ultimately concerned".

God is the object of man's ultimate concern and our attitude in participating with God is our ultimate concern.

Thursday, December 7, 2006

Medieval Notes, Including John Scotus

(Originally written December 7, 2006 in Book 11)

The History of Philosophy vol. 2

Chapter 5 - The Medieval Interval

Plato and Aristotle dominated the Classical period. Augustine and Aquinas dominated the Medieval period; but, lived 8 centuries apart. Augustine and Aquinas dealt with different problems, whereas Plato and Aristotle dealt with the same problems.

The Dark Ages

The barbarian conquering of Rome caused enormous stress. The barbarians were incapable of sustaining such a complex culture like Rome's.

The collapse of a uniform society caused man to primarily focus on staying alive.

The Classical philosophy was lost to Europe in the Dark Ages.

Literacy declined to the point that Charlemagne complained that the clergy did not know enough Latin to interpret the Scriptures.

The Church

Anything surviving from the Roman World in the Dark Ages was due to the Church.

Christianity made converts out of the pagan and Arian barbarians.

"By the end of the Dark Ages, Christianity was more widely spread and Orthodoxy more firmly entrenched than before the barbarian invasions began" (Jones, 142).

The Rise of the Papacy

The early Church was ruled by bishops, not by the Pope.

The doctrine of Papal primacy made the Pope the head of the Church and gave it temporal authority.

A Christian king was subject to the Pope.

Pope Gregory VII in the 11th century pulled papal primacy to its extreme. The power of the Popes stopped Europe from instituting a unified government until the rise of nationalism in the early Modern period.

Monasticism

While the Papacy drove the Church to become a secular power, the spiritual nature was preserved by two things:
1) Monasticism
2) The Friars

Monasticism began in the 5th and 6th centuries A.D.

Monasticism got its credibility from St. Benedict.

Humility was the top virtue in monastic life.

The monastic movement constantly reformed to maintain a spiritual primacy over a temporal primacy. Though it wasn't perfect it worked well enough.

The Friars of St. Francis

Francis of Assisi (1182-1226)

Francis of Assisi was a mystic reformer and founded the Order of the Friars Minor.

He was dedicated to poverty, simplicity and good works.

He achieved a large measure of success in inflaming the hearts of the average man with the love of God.

The main difference between now and the Dark Ages is that men in the Dark Ages were ready at any moment to be touched by the otherworldly.

Feudalism

Particularism began to grow in the fragmented ruins of the old Empire.

Men with property gained power as central governments were too weak to perform duties.

"Immunity" was granted to land owners by the central government which gave them the power of controlling their lands with no government interference.

Small peasant farmers would "commend" their lands to these large land owners. "Commendation" was the act of giving up one's land for protection and security. The ones who commended their lands would live on them and work them still, but they would no longer own the land.

Charlemagne (742-814) organized a strong central government and was crowned Emperor by the Pope. But his kingdom collapsed shortly after his death.

Feudalism was born out of the rapid commending process that followed the collapse of Charlemagne.

Authority and power and administration became inextricable from land ownership.

Medieval society was dominated by the concept of status, not the concept of citizenship.

The Middle Ages had a very fragmented society.

Chivalry

Chivalry was an ideal that emphasized private honor and public service.

Along with the Church and feudalism Chivalry marked the culture of the Middle Ages.

St. Louis, King of France

Louis IX was born in 1214 and set out to recapture Jerusalem in 1248. It failed, but he tried again in 1270.

Louis IX described chivalry as "upright" and "worthy".

Uprightness involved courage, modesty, charitableness, sobriety, faithfulness and justice.

Louis IX saw sin as a disease, much like Augustine.

Louis IX did not extend his notions of charity and humility to the Jews.

Louis IX distrusted education. As St. Francis, Louis IX was satisfied with simple faith.

Louis IX saw outward dignity as vital in society. His count was elaborate and attendants were lavishly dressed to show their rank.

Feudalism was so deeply entrenched in Louis IX's society that his closest friend and biographer, Sire de Joinville would not swear an oath of allegiance to Louis' family in the event he died in Crusade because Joinville was not his liegeman.

Art and Letters

Architecture

The 12th and 13th centuries were a period of great artistic blossoming.

Vaulted circling and stained glass windows marked the new Gothic style. The abbey church of St. Denis, the Cathedral of Noyon, Enlis, Paris, Rheims and the Sainte Chapelle are perfect examples of the Gothic style. The architecture reflected Christian piety.

Painting and Poetry

Painting and poetry moved from static, unmoving depictions to depictions of living, breathing men in nature.

It focused on the world, but their was still an otherworldly element: case in point - Dante.

The chasm between the otherworld and this world was removed. The two worlds were no longer bitter hostiles at war with each other.

Science

Bartholomew the Englishmen

Bartholomew was one of the most popular science writers of the Middle Ages.

He used Aristotle only in a way to describe it in a very confusing manner.

Science was mixed with heresy and old wives tales.

Aristotle and Medieval Science

It took time to assimilate Aristotle to science.

Men in the Middle Ages were more concerned with salvation, not with accumulating the facts.

Vincent Beauvais

Bartholomew and Vincent Beauvais were very unscientific.

The Universities

Some monastic and cathedral schools popped up after Charlemagne's renaissance.

The Universities slowly arose over Europe to satisfy the new hunger for knowledge slowly awakened over the 8th-11th centuries.

Philosophy during the Medieval Interval

The cultural problem for the 13th century philosopher was to find a place for these this-worldly ends in a scheme of life that still had a basically otherworldly orientation. The success of Aquinas lies in solving this central problem.

There was virtually no philosophical development in the 8 centuries between Augustine and Aquinas, save for Boethius, Isidore of Seville and John Scotus Erigena.

John Scotus Erigena

John Scotus Erigena (ca. 810-877) was born in Ireland. He studied Greek in an Irish monastery at a time when Greek was nearly lost in all the west.

He travels to France in 847 and taught at Paris in the palace school that Charlemagne founded.

He was involved in deep theological topics like Free Will and the Eucharist. He avoided the extreme forms of predestination, but went too far and was condemned as a Pealagian. His views were condemned in 855. Then his views on the Eucharist were condemned (he denied the Doctrine of Transubstantiation)

He decided to take a safer task of translating Greek into Latin.

John Scotus Erigena was deeply concerned with synthesis. As a Christian, Erigena must have a synthesis, an overarching philosophy that fit with the Catholic dogma.

Nature

John began with the nature of reality.

He believed that things fall into two classes:
1) Things that are
2) Things that are not

Things that are not have different modes, they are modes of non-being
1) Sinful man
2) Changing particulars
3) Potential being
4) Things that are "beyond our intellect"

Things that are are those things that we can comprehend.

John Scotus Erigena's divisions are influence by Plato (most of the texts he translated were neoplatonic ones)

Like Plato and the Neoplatonists, John identified the form of the Good with God.

God

According to John, God is "beyond being" and thus, not to be. John had a problem in attempting to reconcile Neoplatonic metaphysics and Christian dogma.

John held that there were two ways for finite minds to approach God:
1) An affirmative way
2) A negative way

The affirmative way consists of stating things like God is being, God is good, etc. These assertions are neither wholly true nor wholly false.

Every positive or affirmative statement about God must be supplemented by a negative statement.

Instead of stating the negative and positive about God as "God is being and not-being" he stated then like "God is super being"

John Scotus Erigena believed that God was truly Good, but to say that God was good was misleading because it wasn't the whole truth.

Creation

John Scotus Erigena started with a paradox in dealing with creation. If God made the world He must move, but how can He who is immutable move?

John asserted that the concepts of making and creation (like the concepts of being and goodness) applied to God in only a metaphorical sense.

He also asserted that the transcendence of the the Creator and the dependence of the creature (Two vitally important Church doctrines) were contradictory.

Theophanies

John held the world to be a "theophany" of God (an appearance of God). It is not an illusion, but the chosen method of God to reveal Himself to man. Human minds are a part of this theophany and thus their understanding is a part of God's theophany.

Knowledge is Illumination

"Everything that exists is an aspect of the divine nature reflected from some perspective or other" (Jones, 179).

Knowledge is fundamentally an act of grace by God in which He illumines our mind.

Four-Fold Division of Nature

While nature is truly one and beyond being, the human mind divides and classifies as was God's intention. There are four divisions of nature:
1) God - the nature that creates and is uncreated
2) The Platonic archetypes - the nature that creates and is created
3) The Physical World - the nature that does not create and is created
4) God - The nature that does not create and is not created

"God issues into the world and returns from it to Himself" (Jones, 180).

God is not conscious until he creates His mind. The archetypes are the divine images of God. They do not exist independently. They are the divine mind.

The archetypes (primordial causes) are the sources of the essences of the particulars in the physical world.

The primordial causes are: goodness, being, life, wisdom, truth, intelligence, reason, virtue, justice, health, greatness, omnipotence, eternity and peace. While we view them as a plurality, they are really a unity.

Anything that exists in the physical world that is describable as one of these primordial causes is so because it takes part (a finite part) in them.

The physical world has being by participating in the various primordial substances.

Is John's view Christian?

There are some Neoplatonic interpretations of nature that readily fit within the framework of Catholic Christianity.

John's metaphysics is a rational system, but is in danger of collapsing into subjectivism and mysticism.

The mystic elements were too strong for a Christian standard at his time. A private mystical basis was not the solution the Church as an institution was looking for.

John's fourth level (not-created and non-creating) seems to destroy individuality. Man's eternal salvation is done through a return to God by all souls. It is not exactly Kosher with the Church. It is blasphemy and heresy.

John's neoplatonism also renders sin and evil as unreal.

John also had to interpret the Scriptures rather loosely.

He also used the writings of St. Dionysius the Areopagite as an almost canonical authority. Unfortunately, St. Dionysius the Areopagite was later shown to be a fake.

The Neoplatonic Problem

Neoplatonic metaphysics and Christian Dogma are antagonistic. The problem was to include some deeply entrenched Neoplatonic ideals of the Middle Ages into Christianity.

The Controversy over Universals

The thinkers of the 11th century were logicians, not metaphysicians. They focused their energy on two very technical problems:
1) The status of universals
2) the relation between the spheres of faith and reason

It was desirable, if only for pragmatic reasons, to prove the Christian truths.

Reason was an indispensable weapon agains infidels and heretics.

Men of the Middle Ages basically agreed there were three modes of cognition
1) Revelation
2) Reason
3) Perception

The problem of universals and the scope of faith and reason was (and is) an interrelated problem.

Saturday, July 29, 2006

The Eclipse of the Papacy

(Originally written July 29, 2006 in Book 5)

The History of Western Philosophy
Bertrand Russell

Chapter XV - The Eclipse of the Papacy

The Christian 13th century was the culmination of Greek philosophy, Alexander's conquests and oriental religions.

Russell calls Satan "a development of Ahriman" (Russell, 476). Ahriman was an evil Persian God.

Linehan - Yes, Christianity incorporated a number of influences, but to state that it is wholly derivative is ridiculous. Also to not explicitly state the influence of ancient Judaism is wholly disgusting from a purely historical point of view... Russell does pay lip service to the Jewish element of Christianity. My apologies.

Russell believes that the switch from Plato to Aristotle may have been detrimental.

The Pope became a pawn of the French King.

The rise of a wealthy merchant class also took power from the papacy.

Cities became more independent from Pope and Emperor.

The decline of the papacy can be stated as the beginning with a plenary indulgence issued in the first jubilee year by Pope Boniface VIII.

The Avignon Papacy caused further independence form the Pope and weekend its power.

Pope Gregory XI returned the papacy to Rome. The French Cardinal's split form the Church causing the Great Schism. The Schism ended in 1417 with the council of Constance and the crowning of Pope Martin V.

John Wycliffe (1320-1384) shows the decline of Papal power. Wycliffe was a realist and a Platonist, but a scholastic nonetheless. He was orthodox until he was 50 then became heretical. The heresy became apparent in 1376 with the lectures at Oxford called "On Civil Dominion". His heresies were on property ownership. Eighteen theses of Wycliffe were condemned by Gregory XI. He was protected by the Queen and the mob of England from the Pope's summons. He translated the Vulgate into English and labeled the Pope as an anti-Christ. He denounced transubstantiation as a blasphemous folly. He got into more trouble when he did not condemn the Peasant's Revolt of 1381. He was excommunicated in 1366. His teachings were stamped out in England but reached Bohemia and Jan Hus. The Hussites paved the way for the Reformation.

End of Book 2

Linehan - I have lost a bit of respect for Russell in his treatment of Christianity. He labels many devout Christians as bigots, but his tactics are driven by bigotry. He is inconsistent and a great bigot himself. There have been a number of atrocities performed in the name of Christ, but how many atrocities have been performed in some other name? Christians ought to be held in a higher judgment, but atrocities performed in Christ's name discredits the performers and performances, not Christ.

Chapter 14 - Franciscan Schoolmen

(Originally written July 29, 2006 in Book 5)

The History of Western Philosophy
Bertrand Russell

Chapter 14 - Franciscan Schoolmen

The Franciscans and Dominicans were bitter rivals. The Franciscans were less orthodox. They were disinclined to accept the authority of Thomas Aquinas (a Dominican).

The Franciscans produced Roger Bacon, Duns Scotus, William of Occam, Saint Bonaventura and Matthew of Aquasparta.

Roger Bacon lived from 1214-1294. Bacon was a philosopher and a man of science. Science was mixed up with black magic and alchemy at the time so Bacon was in constant danger of being labeled a heretic. He was placed under a no-publish edict by the head of the Franciscans, but commanded by the papal legate to England to write his philosophy for the benefit o the Pope. He wrote three books in a very short time:
1) Opus Majus
2) Opus Minus
3) Opus Tertium

He was imprisoned for condemning clerics for ignorance. He was imprisoned 14 years and died shortly after being released. He was experimental by nature; encyclopedic but not systematic. He was a good geographer and a good mathematician. He thought logic was useless and wrote on alchemy.

He believed there were four causes for ignorance:
1) frail and unsuitable authority
2) influence of custom
3) the opinion of the unlearned crowd
4) the concealment of ignorance by apparent wisdom

All ignorance produces the evils that plague mankind. The fourth is the worst.

He considers Aristotle to be the chief philosopher and Avicenna the price.

He sees no fault in finding truth from the heathen and quotes Avicenna, Averroes, Alfarabi and Albumazar.

He sees mathematics as the only unrivaled source of certitude.

He believed that the intellect is separate from the soul.

Modern times praise Bacon because he places experimentation as a source of knowledge in higher esteem than argumentation as a source.

He believed in magic and astrology.

He is more respected now than he was in medieval times.

St. Bonaventura (1221-1274) was the General of the Franciscan order. He believed in the ontological argument for God. He believed in Platonic Ideas and saw Aristotelianism as in opposition to Christianity. He quoted Augustine extensively but ignored Pagan and Arab philosophies.

Matthew of Aquasparta (1235-1302) was a follower of Bonaventura. He opposed Aquinas from an Augustinian point of view. He quotes Aristotle, Avicenna, Anselm, the pseudo-dionysius and chiefly, Augustine.

He believed that Plato's ideas produce wisdom, but not knowledge and Aristotle produced knowledge but not wisdom. He sought to sync the two.

Duns Scotus (1270-1308) was Scottish and joined the Franciscans at Oxford University. He fought Aquinas on the immaculate conception and won the argument. He was Augustinian but less severe than other Franciscans.

Franciscans often disagreed with Aquinas because he was Aristotelian and the Franciscans were Platonic (through Augustine).

Scouts was a moderate realist, believed in Free Will and leaned somewhat to Pelagianism.

He held that there was no difference between being and essence.

He focused on evidence, things knowable without proof. There were three kinds of evidence:
1) Principles known by themselves
2) Things known by experience
3) our own actions

Without divine illumination no one can know anything.

He held the the principle of individuation (what makes one thing not identical with another) was due to form, not matter.

William of Occam is the second most important scholastic philosopher next to Aquinas. He lived circa 1290-1350. He was a pupil, then a rival of Scotus. He was excommunicated by Pope John XXII and took refuge with Emperor Louis (who was likewise excommunicated).

Dante (1265-1321) was an influential commentator in this age. Marsiglio of Padua (1270-1342) was a friend of William of Occham and a great political force of the time (in theory, not action). Marsiglio and William sought to preserve the Catholic faith, but fought against papal absolutism.

William's political works are done in a philosophical disputation style. William is best known for Occam's razor "it is vain to do with more what can be done with fewer" (Russell, 472).

In logic, William of Occam was a homilist.

He set to free logic and theory of knowledge from the basis of metaphysics and theology.

He holds that there are six metaphysical terms:
1) being
2) thing
3) something
4) one
5) true
6) good

He holds universals are things that can be predicated to many.

William of Occam believed perception to be the definition of knowledge.

His work encouraged scientific research.

After William of Occam there were no great scholastic philosophers.

Saint Thomas Aquinas

(Originally Written July 29, 2006 in Book 5)

The History of Western Philosophy
Bertrand Russell

Chapter 13 - St. Thomas Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) is the greatest scholastic philosopher of all time.

Catholic philosophies still teach his philosophical system as the only true system.

He has the respect and authority of the Church Fathers in Catholicism.

Thomas was the son out Count Aquino and born in Naples near Monte Cassino. Monte Cassino is where the "angelic doctor" began his education. He then studied at the University of Naples. He became a Dominican and then studied under Albertus Magnus at Cologne.

Aquinas had a fuller understanding of Aristotle than other scholastics. He disliked Neo-Platonism, even in the writings of Augustine.

He convinced the Church in the philosophy of Aristotle, despite misinterpretations of Islamic Avveroist Aristotelians.

Thomas' most important work is the Summa Contra Gentiles. Its purpose is to establish the truth of Christianity in arguments to Non-Christians.

Summa Theologica is of almost equal importance, but is addressed to Christians.

This is an abstract of Summa Contra Gentiles

1) Wisdom is concerned with the end of the universe
2) The end of the Universe is the good of the intellect (truth)
3) Natural Reason is deficient in the things of God. It can prove some parts, but not all. It can prove the existence of God and the immortality of the Soul, but not the Trinity, the Incarnation or the Last Judgment.
4) Nothing in revelation (the Scriptures) is contrary to reason

Linehan - Not exactly.

The Summa Contra Gentiles is divided into four parts. The first three do not refer to the Scriptures as arguments.

The first step for Aquinas was to prove the existence of God. He rejected the ontological argument because it requires man to know the essence of God, which is impossible. The existence of God can be proved, but it can also be deduced by faith. Aquinas denies that only faith makes God knowable.

Aristotle proved the existence of God through the argument of the unmoved mover:
1) There are things that are only moved
2) There are things which move and are moved.
3) Whatever is moved, is moved by something
4) An endless series of movers is impossible.
Conclusion: There necessarily exists something that moves without being moved. This unmoved mover is God.

Aquinas gives five proofs for the existence of God in the Summa Theologica 
1) the argument of the unmoved mover
2) the argument of the first cause
3) there must be an ultimate source of all necessity
4) the various perfections of this would must have their source in something completely perfect
5) Non-living things have a purpose, but only living things have a purpose and thus something outside of them must have a purpose.

In returning to the Summa Contra Gentiles: after proving the existence of God we can say many things about him in a negative sense.
1) He is unmoved, thus eternal
2) He contains no passive potentiality, thus he is unchanging
3) He is not primary matter (pure passivity) thus he is pure activity
4) God has no composition, thus no body, thus no body parts, thus he must be something other than physical

Since God is not a composite he is his own essence.

God's essence and existence are identical.

There are no accidents in God. He cannot be defined.

It is more proper to state that X is similar to God in such a way than to say that God is similar to X.

God is good. He is the good of every good.

He is intelligent. His act of intelligence is His essence. He understands by His essence and understands himself perfectly.

God understands forms because he created them. He understands the world as being like Him in a way or unlike him in another way. God understand the plant as:
1) like him in that it is alive
2) unlike him in that it is not possessing of knowledge.

A creature always differs from God in some form of negation.

God understand all  things at the same instant.

God is literally truth.

Aquinas is now troubled with the question, can God know particular things or does He only know universals and general truths? As a Christian, Aquinas believes in providence and that demands that God must know particular things despite weighty arguments against this view. Aquinas states 7 contrary arguments then refutes them.
1) Singularity being signate matter, nothing immaterial can know it. Refutation God knows singulars as their cause.
2) Singulars do not always exist and cannot be known when they do not exist; therefore they cannot be known by an unchanging being. Refutation God nows things that do not yet exist
3) Singulars are contingent, not necessary. Therefore there can be no certain knowledge of them except when they exist. Refutation He sees all time as present.
4) Some singulars are due to volitions, which can only be known to the person willing the volition. Refutation God knows our minds and secret wills
5) Singulars are infinite in number and the infinite as such is unknown. Refutation God knows an infinity of things
6) Singulars are too petty for God's attention. Refutation Nothing is wholly trivial.
7) IN some singulars there is evil, but God cannot know evil. Refutation God knows evil things because he knows what is good and anything not good must be evil.

God possesses will. His will is His essence. His will is the cause of other things. He does not will necessarily. It is free-will.

God hates nothing. He is happy and is His own happiness.

God create the world out of nothing.

God cannot be a body, change, fail, be weary, forget, repent, be angry or sad, create a man with no soul, make the sum of the angles of a triangle be the sum of two right angles, undo the past, commit sins, make another God or make himself not exist.

Intellectual substances are immaterial and incorruptible.

The intellect is part of the soul.

The soul is not created through sexual reproduction, it is created new in each body.

Linehan - I tentatively reject this view. The soul must be reproduced in sex for the inheritance of sin to happen.

Thomas adopts Aristotle's view on universals. "Universals do no subsist outside the soul, but the intellect, in understanding universals, understands things that are outside the soul" (Russell, 458).

Evil is unintentional, not an essence. It has an accidental cause, which is good.

God is the end of all things so all things tend to be like God.

Man's happiness lies in moral virtue, not bodily pleasures. It consists in the contemplation of God.

Ultimate happiness is unachievable on earth. It only exists in heaven, when we see God face to face (even though God doesn't really have a face).

Divine Providence does not negate evil, contingency, free will, chance or luck.

Evil comes through second causes.

Angels are each individual species.

Astrology is rejected, as well as any notion of fate.

Prayer is useful in spite of Providence being unchangeable.

Miracles are solely performed by God. Magic is demonic.

Divine law:
1) directs us to love God
2) directs us to love our neighbor, but not as vividly
3) it forbids birth control because it is against nature (interestingly it does not forbid celibacy)
4) matrimony is indissoluble
5) not all carnal intercourse is sinful, but continence is a better life than marriage
6) monogamy is demanded
7) incest is forbidden

Mortal sins demand Hell as punishment. No man can be forgiven of sin without grace, yet is condemned if he doesn't convert.

God is not the cause of sin, but chooses to free some from sin and leave others in sin.

Aquinas states God is knowable three ways:
1) Reason
2) Revelation
3) Intuition of previous revelation

He blames the Greek Church for denying the double procession of the Holy Ghost and the supremacy of the pope.

He believes the sacraments are valid even if dispensed by a wicked priest.

Aquinas basically agrees with Aristotle philosophically. He is original in aptly adapting Aristotle to Christian dogma.

He was very innovative and condemned in Paris and Oxford universities.

He was even more remarkable in systematizing then originality. "Even if every one of his doctrines were mistaken, the Summa would remain an imposing intellectual edifice" (Russell, 461).

He is fair to arguments and positions contrary to his own. He then firmly dismantles them.

He does a good job in distinguishing arguments from reason and arguments from revelation.

He thoroughly knows Aristotle.

Russell contends that since Aquinas already knows the outcome of his arguments (revealed by God) that he cannot be regarded as an elite philosopher.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

Ecclesiastical Reform in the 11th Century

(Originally written July 23, 2006 in Book 5)

The History of Western Philosophy
Bertrand Russell

Chapter IX - Ecclesiastical Reform in the 11th Century

The progress of the 11th century began with monastic reform.

The Church sought to consolidate its power but it had to clean up itself first by ridding themselves of two great evils:
1) Simony
2) Concubinage

Simony was the practice of selling a position in the Church for a sum of money.

Celibacy in the clergy was more for political reasoning then Biblical. Priests who had sons passed Church property onto them. The Church did not like this. Celibacy set men apart from others. For priests to be revered in the highest esteem they necessarily had to be celibate. The Church demanded them to be set apart from the laity. Celibacy was a means to this end.

William the Pious, Duke of Aquitaine, founded the Abbey of Cluny and the Cluniac reform movement in 910 AD.

The Camaldolese Orderwas founded by Romuad and the Camaldolese produced Peter Damian.

Bruno of Cologne founded the Carthusians in 1084.

In 1098 the Cistercian Order was founded. St. Bernard joined them in 1113.

The reform of the Papacy began with a simony Pope, Pope Gregory VI. Gregory VI was deposed for simony by the Holy Roman Emperor Henry III in 1046. Henry III continually deposed popes and appointed new ones. Pope Leo IX was then appointed by Henry III in 1049.

Leo IX was a reformer. He claimed independence from Henry III and the Papacy claimed superiority over the Emperor.

The college of Cardinals was set up to select the Pope, depriving the Romans and the Emperors of power.

Pope Nicholas II played a large part in reducing simony. Nicholas II also fought with the archbishop of Milan, who thought he was independent of the Pope.

Saint Peter Damian was crucial to the Milanese clerics repenting of their simony and pledging allegiance to the Papacy.

Pope Gregory VII became Pope in 1073. He was one of the most eminent Popes of all time. Gregory VII enforced clerical celibacy more than any other previous pope. Gregory VII dealt with the Investiture controversy, excommunicating Emperor Henry IV and thus causing civil war in the feudal Holy Roman Empire.

The 10th century was almost devoid of philosophers except for Pope Sylvester II (999-1003).

The 11th century produced a number of philosophers:
1) Anselm
2) Roscelin
3) Peter Damian
4) Berengar of Tours - a semi rationalist
4) Lanfranc

Anselm came up with the ontological argument for the existence of God. The ontological argument states:
1) God is the greatest possible objet of thought
2) If an object of thought does not exist, another, exactly like it, which does exist is greater.
3) The greatest of all objects of thought must exist. Otherwise another object would exist and be greater.
4) Thus, God exists.

The ontological argument has been rejected by theologians, but has faired better among philosophers. Descartes used an amended formed. Leibniz used it to prove the possibility of God. It underlies the Hegelian system. Bradley used it.

Anselm believed in Platonic ideas. He used Neoplatonic arguments to prove the existence of the Trinity.

Anselm considered reason subordinate to faith.

Sunday, July 16, 2006

Three Doctors of the Church

(Originally Written July 16, 2006 in Book 5)

The History of Western Philosophy
Bertrand Russell

Chapter III - Three Doctors of the Church

By the way I am watching "Take Home Defensive Driving". Rest of all it cost $40 bucks. Ridiculous. Secondly, it is four hours long. Absurd. Thirdly, it is immensely boring. Irritating.

There are four men regarded as Doctors of the Western Church. (I believe there are a number who have been added since Russell wrote this).

1) St. Ambrose
2) St. Jerome
3) St. Augustine
4) Pope Gregory the Great

"Ambrose, Jerome and Augustine all flourished during the brief period between the victory of the Catholic Church in the Roman Empire and the barbarian invasion" (Russell, 334).

The Barbarian invasions stunted intellectual growth and men of this caliber were not produced for another thousand years.

They, more than any other men molded the Church in how it would be shaped.

Ambrose determined the Church as being dominant to the State. Jerome produced the Latin Vulgate and made great strides in monasticism. Augustine laid the foundation of theology until the reformation and was widely used by both Luther and Calvin.

Ambrose's establishment as the Church being independent of the State was not challenged (philosophically) until Hobbes. It was revolutionary. The capital of the Western Empire at the end of the fourth century was Milan. Ambrose was the bishop of Milan.

His duties brought him into contact with the emperors frequently. He always treated them at least as equals, sometimes as subordinates.

At his time the State was "feeble, incompetent, governed by unprincipled self-seekers, and totally without any policy beyond that of momentary expedients. Contrarily, the Church was vigorous, able, guided by men prepared to sacrifice everything personal in its interests, and with a policy so far-sighted that it brought victory for the next thousand years" (Russell, 335).

Ambrose had every opportunity to become a powerful political figure.

Ambrose was born at Augusta Treverorum to a prefect of the Guals. At thirteen he went to Rome, was educated and learned a strong grounding in Greek. The young adult Ambrose took to law and was successful.

At 30 he became the governor of Liguria and Æmilia. At 34 he turned away from the secular government and became bishop of Milan. He gave all his wealth to the poor and served the Church the rest of his life, sometimes in the face of peril.

All three Doctors of this period, Jerome, Augustine and Ambrose wrote innumerable letters, many of which have survived. For this reason we know them better than any pagan philosopher or ecclesiastics of the Middle Ages.

Jerome wrote mostly to women, instructing them on how to maintain their virginity. Augustine wrote letters to everyone, mostly on doctrine or Church discipline. Ambrose wrote most interesting letters to emperors, chastising them when they failed in their duties and praising them when they fulfilled them.

The first public matter Ambrose dealt with was the altar and stature to Victory in Rome. It was a pagan icon removed by Constantinius (son of Constantine) reinstated by Julian the Apostate and then removed again by Emperor Gratian. Paganism lasted longer in the Senate than elsewhere in Rome. After Gratian's death a senator named Symmachus (a pagan) fought to bring it back. In 384 he became the prefect of Rome. When Symmachus sought to have the new Emperor Valentian II put it back, Ambrose wrote the boy king. He wrote "Let no one take advantage of your youth" and put for the thesis that "as all Romans owed military service to their sovereign, so he (the Emperor) owed service to the Almighty God" (Russell, 337). In addition to flattery, Ambrose threatened the young emperor with not being able to see a priest in Church or receiving a hostile greeting from a priest. Ambrose won the argument. But a usurper of Valentian II, Eugenics (a pagan) restored the idol. In 394 Emperor Theodosius defeated Eugenics and removed the altar.

Initially Ambrose had favor in the imperial court. But when the mother of Valentian II, Empress Justina (an Arian) asked for an Arian church in Milan, the Catholic Ambrose refused. The Empress sent troops to a church in Milan demanding it as it belonged to the Emperor. Ambrose assured the Empress that she may take anything that belonged to the emperor but since the wealth of the church belonged to the poor and the church to God, he had nothing to give her. The soldiers refused to take the church by force because the citizens backed Ambrose. The empress gave in. This established the precedent of the Church having authority over the State in some matters.

Ambrose's next conflict came with the Emperor Theodosius. A synagogue was burned at a bishop's instigation. Theodosius demanded that those responsible be punished and the synagogue be rebuilt at the bishop's expense. Ambrose was furious. He demanded that no such action be taken because it would cause only trouble. If the punishment is carried out the bishop will be martyred for standing up for his faith in Christ or acquiesce and become apostate. Also, money of the Church should not be used to support unbelief (as occurs in a synagogue). Theodosius backed down.

The next conflict between these two occurred when a mob in Thessolonica murdered a Roman captain. Theodosius orchestrated the slaughter of 7,000 Thessalonians in revenge. Ambrose withheld the sacraments from Theodosius until the emperor rented. Theodosius repented, without his purple kingly robes and paid public penance.

Ambrose was a remarkable statesman, but inferior to Augustine in philosophy and inferior to Jerome as a scholar.

Jerome is most notable for producing the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible. The Vulgate was translated from original Hebrew texts, not the more erroneous Septuagint. Because Jerome illicit help from Jews in the translation it was initially met with harsh responses. Augustine's endorsement helped it to become the accepted version of the Catholic Church.

Jerome was born in 345 AD near Aquileia to a well-to-do, but not rich family. He studied rhetoric in Rome but he sinned there. He traveled through Gaul, retiring to Aquileia and became ascetic. He became a hermit in the Syrian desert and performed penance for his sinfulness in Rome. He then went back to Rome and befriended Pope Damasus, who encouraged him to create the Vulgate.

Jerome was quarrelsome to say the least. He fought with Augustine over the behavior of St. Peter. He fought with his friend Rufinius over Origen. He opposed Pelagius so avidly that his monastery was attacked by a Pelagian mob. He also fought with the Pope after the death of Damasus.

He left Rome for Bethlehem in 386 and lived there until his death in 420.

He converted and convinced many noble women to become nuns, pissing off people all over.

A young girl he convinced to become a nun was Eustochium. He wrote letters to her on how to maintain her virginity, exact meanings of Old Testament euphemisms, erotic mystical praise of covenantal life, stated that a nun is the Bride of Christ and the the Song of Solomon praises this type of relationship.

Linehan - I believe that this is a very bad misrepresentation of this book.

In a vision Jerome heard Christ tell him that he was a follower of Cicero, not Christ. Upon waking from this vision he denounced his love of Greek and Roman learning.

In his letters he embodies the Christian otherworldly hope of redemption outside of the collapsing world of the temporal Roman Empire.

It is strange (Russell contends) that Jerome, Augustine, and Ambrose all devoted themselves to Church issues, but no practical measures  to save their collapsing state.

Linehan - The emphasis on virginity by the early church to me seems harmful. It is true that some men and women may be called to a life of abstinence, but I do not think that this is a very likely occurrence. I know from a personal standpoint that living an abstinent life makes it hard to focus on anything other than virginity or how to lose it. I remained a virgin because of fear (partially) and because of failure (mostly). This was a source of enormous tension, self-turmoil, disappointment, frustration, agony, desperation, depression, guilt and countless hours of wasted time and effort. Virginity or abstinence as an end is not a virtue. What makes it virtuous is the reasoning behind it. If one declares perpetual virginity in accordance to God's plan then it is virtuous, but if it (or anything) is done as a way to impress God it is boastful and not a virtue at all. Also I find the practice of father's giving their daughters over to virginity reprehensible. It's a shame that things like this happened within Christianity because it gives ammo to those who are seeking to attack Christianity.

Augustine was born in 354 in Africa to a Christian mother and Pagan father. He spent time as a Manichaean, then became a Christian. He then became the bishop of Hippo, near Carthage, where he remained until he died in 430.

We know much of Augustine's life because of his autobiographical work Confessions.

Augustine was a passionate youth, unconcerned with virtue and impulsive. He searched for truth and righteousness relentlessly.

His youthful sins caused him to have a strong sense of sin later in life, "which made his life stern and his philosophy inhuman" (Russell, 345).

Linehan - I'm sure Russell meant this as a stab, but Augustine may very well have modestly accepted it as a compliment. I must admit that there are a few philosophers, theologians, or men that matter, with whom I identify with or respect more than Augustine.

Augustine opens Confessions with the story of stealing a pear for mischief's sake alone. He condemns himself for loving the act of sinning so much. Russell mocks this and calls it morbid to the modern mind. While this may be true it is a blight on the modern mind, not on Augustine.

Christian theology had two parts:
1) that concerned with the Church
2) that concerned with the individual.

The Catholics emphasized the first. The Protestants emphasized the second. Augustine created a harmonious synthesis that focused on both without any inconsistencies.

Augustine believed individual soul wee predestined to salvation, but had to be baptized and become a member of the Church. Predestination marks a direct connection between God and man, the Church was an intermediate between.

Sin was essential to the direct relation for two reasons:
1) Shows how God can cause man to suffer
2) Shows how souls are the most important member of the created order.

Russell calls Augustine's sense of sin 'abnormal'. Russell's indifference to sin however, is much more abnormal than any developed sense of it.

Augustine grabbed Latin easily, but hated Greek.

Lust overcame him at the age of sixteen.

Augustine's father did not pay any attention to his sins but kept him focused on school. His mother, in vain, tried to keep him chaste. He went to Carthage at 16 and fell in love with love. He also took a mistress because he was not ready for a wife, but was faithful to her and had a son he loved by her.

His mother then encouraged him to marry a girl worthy of his social status (which his mistress was not). In breaking up with his mistress to be married he broke his heart. He then took another mistress while waiting for his bride-to-be to come of age. At this time he prayed, "give me chastity and continence, only not yet" (Russell, 348).

By the time his marriage was to occur he had devoted himself to religion and chastity.

Augustine was excellent in rhetoric and introduced to philosophy by Cicero. He then became a Manichaean and taught rhetoric. He was fond of astrology at this time, but later despised it.

He read as much philosophy as was translated into Latin and mentions Aristotle's 'Ten Categories'. He grasped these works without a teacher, but decried his understanding because it profited him none.

Initially he began to reject Manichaeism because of scientific reasons, citing astronomy and Mani's (the founder of Manichaeism) blatant errors on astronomical matters. After doubting Manichaeism he went to teach in Rome.

He began to feel at odds with the Manichaeans more and more in Rome and began to slide in to skepticism, but still believed that something in men, some nature caused them to sin.

He believed evil to be a substance.

From Rome he went to Milan to teach rhetoric. He began to love Ambrose and admire the Catholic faith, but his newfound skepticism held him back.

His mother joined him in Milan and hastened his conversion.

In Milan he became acquainted with Platonism and fused the Platonic metaphysical doctrine of Logos with Christianity.

He then completely rejected Manichaeism and the notion of Evil as a substance, instead believing evil to come from the perverseness of the will.

Augustine found comfort in the writings of St. Paul (one reason I identify with him so well).

He gave up his new mistress and his wife-to-be and devoted himself to the Church. He moved back to Africa in 388 and spent the remainder of his life fighting heresies like the Donates, Manichaeism and Pelagianism.