(Originally written February 10, 2006)
Class Notes: Descartes: "I think, therefore I am"
Context for Descartes:
1) Rising Skepticism was taking over France
2) Rise of Science
1st Meditation
The Method of Doubt (a sort of vaccination)
Method of doubt: criterion of knowledge: indubitably
-This criteria doomed Descartes' theory from the beginning
Three phases of doubt:
1) The senses are untrustworthy
2) Dreaming vs. Waking
3) Evil Genius
- A being that attempts to fool me throughout my life
Uses the method of doubt to find a secure foundation for knowledge: Archimedean Point
2nd Meditation
Descartes' Archimedean Point: I exist
Gassendi's criticism - Descartes doesn't follow his own rules
External World
God guarantees the senses
God exists
Human Nature
Cogito - The indubitable belief (foundation)
What is the cogito?
- an inference?
- a syllogism?
- an intuition?
Criticisms of the cogito?
1) Russell's criticism
- How do we know the "I" has a referent
2) Begs the question:
- If the "I" does move a referent then Descartes approach is circular: I (who exist), think, therefore I am
No comments:
Post a Comment