(Originally written November 16, 2016 in Book 26)
Introducing Plato
D. Robinson
Particulars are contingent
Universals are the properties that particulars share with one another.
Plato was the first philosopher to see that universals were problematic.
Plato tried to explain it with a two-world system. A perfect world of universals and an imperfect world of copies (particulars).
The world of forms/ideas is never quite explained perfectly.
Forms exist in their own world and can only be "recollected only in the minds of a few talented and well-trained individuals" (Robinson, 65).
Plato's epistemology is difficult because it is mystical and therefore, not directly communicable.
Plato needed the forms to deal with the problem of Heraclitus' flux.
"Forms are more 'real' than particulars, because, unlike particulars, they are eternal and unchanging. Authentic philosophical knowledge can only ever be of these 'forms'" (Robinson, 74).
Everyone is born with the knowledge of the forms because everyone encounters them in earlier lives.
Some of the reason why Plato thought this way about particulars and universals was an account of the Greek language. It was a sort of linguistic determinism. It equates "meeting" and "knowing".
Heidegger was similar in his thinking as German is similar to Greek in how it deals with nouns. It precedes nouns with either masculine, feminine and neuter articles, allowing Heidegger to think about "the nothingness" rather than nothingness.
The forms suffer from an infinite regress, or third man argument.
Plato was also unsure if all man-made objects had forms or not.
The forms have weird ontological problems as well. How can the forms have more reality than particulars? Can reality have degrees?
Plato, because of the notion that meeting and knowing are the same thing, "Maintaining that real knowledge has to be a kind of personal and mystical encounter" (Robinson, 84).
What about universals?
Aristotle - universals are real, but don't exist separately
British Empiricists - universals are a mental image arrived at by abstraction.
"Wittgenstein suggested that our craving for definitive generalities can never be ultimately satisfied, and it is rather unhealthy" (Robinson, 87).
Plato introduced a problem that has not been satisfactorily solved.
Political Philosophy
Plato's view of society is communitarian, emphasizing the social nature of individuals. "Individuals can therefore be judged primarily in terms of their contribution to the State" (Robinson, 88).
The formation of the State came from humans developing a taste for luxury. Divisions of labor is then necessary to provide the luxuries.
Plato would turn the education over to the State (away from the hands of the dangerous Sophists). His educational system is roughly based on the Spartan system which produced a strong army and a stable society.
Plato wanted his society to have experts in every profession. The experts in ruling would get the guardian status and guardian education.
Plato would teach the myth that each man was born of a certain type of metal, thus predetermining every man's status in life.
The myth of the Cave allegory illustrates the ability and the duty of the guardian class.
Those who exit the cave know true knowledge comes from thinking, not seeing.
Plato's ideal republic is hierarchical but because of the myth of the four metals it will function well because everyone will know and accept their place in society (like a beehive).
"By the second generation, everyone will believe this myth of hierarchical castes to be natural and inevitable. Plato is quite content to admit that his hierarchical society must be based on a lie" (Robinson, 101).
Marx inverted the term "ideology" to explain how Plato's big lie works in reality.
The Guardian life is extremely rigorously controlled:
- lived coed in the barracks
- own no property
- breed only with one another by lot
- children are not left with their parents
"Plato's guardians are allowed no individuality or personal freedom" (Robinson, 103).
The social system Plato advocates is severe but it is meritocratic and is not sexist.
"Socrates maintained that morality is a special kind of knowledge which, once known, would always be chosen. Plato seems to have agreed, but argued that this knowledge must be restricted to Guardian experts who will always know the 'correct' answers to all moral problems" (Robinson, 106).
Plato had no time for art in the ideal republic. Only art as propaganda would be admitted. (This art foreshadowed the propagandist art of the Nazis and Soviets).
Plato's moral geometry is often rejected for being inflexible and for reason linking morality and knowledge.
Plato was anti-democratic because democrats have to resort to populism to stay in power. Populist policies are thus favored over wise ones.
"Democratic politicians are merely the slaves of those they pretend to rule, and ordinary people are volatile, violent and bestial" (Robinson, 114).
Popper argued against Plato for his utopianism.
Utopianists often advocate for wiping the slate clean which entails the destruction of society to build a new one.
"The Laws makes a disappointing ending to a philosophical body of work that began with a total commitment to Socrates' own freedom of speech and thought" (Robinson, 131).
"Because Plato cannot have perfect people, he insists on perfect laws which must be obeyed because they are perfect" (Robinson, 131).
The Symposium
Plato seems convinced that homosexual love could be transformed into something spiritually transcendental.
What is love?
Phaedrus: a good thing that instills honor and self-sacrifice
Pausanias: love is sensual gratification but is somehow purer when directed at young men rather than young women
Eryximachus: "love is the cosmic force that constitutes the universe itself" (Robinson, 134).
Aristophanes: Everyone was originally male, female and hermaphrodite. Love is the quest to find the lost part of one's soul. (Zeus punished humanity by splitting everyone into single genders).
Agathon - love is a yearning towards some object of beauty which is not yet possessed.
Diotima - love is the link between sensible and spiritual worlds. "If love is that which moves towards what is beautiful, and wisdom is beautiful, then love is the manifestation of the human soul seeking out the true wisdom of the forms" (Robinson, 136).
The Timaeus
Presents a cosmological account of creation.
"Time is simply a series of numbers that measure how the sub-standard cosmos is always changing" (Robinson, 142).
Plato follows Empedocles' view that all matter is various combinations of the four elements.
Humans are different because of their soul. The soul will return to its star after death if the owner of the soul lived a deserving life.
Plato also advocated metempsychosis (reincarnation) for those souls who aren't worthy of returning to its home star.
Plato's cosmology is similar to M-theory and other string theories that rely on mathematics.
Plato vacillates in the Thaetetus on his theories of perception. Sometimes he is a phenomenalist (we perceive mental images of the world, not the world itself). Sometimes he is a naive realist.
Despite his waffling on the notion of perception he remains staunchly a rationalist - all permanent knowledge comes through thought.
Being a rationalist, Plato had to come up with reasons for error. He claimed that errors arose from memory misapplication.
Knowledge - that which we believe, that which is true and that which we can clearly identify.
The Phaedrus condemns writing because writing is complete. Philosophy is always a process and therefore never complete. As such, dialoge is the best tool for philosophical discovery.
Plato had a long and varied influence:
- Origen developed a neo-platonic theology
- Galileo embraced Plato in his anti-Aristotelian view
- Hegel's dialectical philosophy
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Monday, November 14, 2016
Introducing Plato (C)
(Originally written November 14, 2016 in Book 26)
Introducing Plato
Dave Robinson
All of Plato's theories stem from his epistemology. "Plato's theory of knowledge is really what made him famous, even though no one fully understands it and Plato himself eventually had grave reservations about it" (Robinson, 61).
2 Types of knowledge:
1) Empirical - derived from the senses. But this isn't good because the empirical world was a sort of illusion. It is empirically different for each observer. Thus, one can only have an opinion of the sensible world.
Introducing Plato
Dave Robinson
All of Plato's theories stem from his epistemology. "Plato's theory of knowledge is really what made him famous, even though no one fully understands it and Plato himself eventually had grave reservations about it" (Robinson, 61).
2 Types of knowledge:
1) Empirical - derived from the senses. But this isn't good because the empirical world was a sort of illusion. It is empirically different for each observer. Thus, one can only have an opinion of the sensible world.
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Introducing Plato (B)
(Originally written November 13, 2016 in Book 26)
Introducing Plato
D. Robinson & J. Groves
The Sophists sold their wisdom for profit. They treated philosophy as a self-help method to earn political position.
Plato & Socrates were hostile to the Sophists for two reasons:
1. The Sophists debased philosophy
2. The Sophists sold their teaching to whoever could pay, not just the Aristocracy
Sophists were on a sliding scale, but preached cultural and ethical relativism and ethical skepticism. The worst held ethical nihilism as a viewpoint.
Protagoras (490-420 BC)
- Agnostic
- Ethical relativist
While Protagoras was a relativist and Sophist he did garner some respect from Plato and Socrates, which is more than the cynical Callicles in the Gorgias got.
The Meno:
Concludes that virtue cannot be taught, it must be recalled.
"For Plato, knowledge is something we are already born with, and so 'learning' is simply forcing this knowledge to resurface into our conscious minds" (Robinson, 44).
Learning is anamnesis - recalling something imparted from the divine to the pre-existant souls of men.
The Republic:
Thrasymachus argues that society and the state are artificial constructs to limit the natural state of men.
Thrasymachus' views on morality predicted the views of Nietzsche and Marx.
Glaucon has a very negative view of humanity and posits a psychological egoist viewpoint. Humans are vicious, predatory beasts. Thomas Hobbes adopted this view and advocated strong governments to enforce morality.
Plato chooses not to argue against this as "psychological egoist explanations of all human behavior usually tend to be self-confirming and difficult to refute (Robinson, 60).
Introducing Plato
D. Robinson & J. Groves
The Sophists sold their wisdom for profit. They treated philosophy as a self-help method to earn political position.
Plato & Socrates were hostile to the Sophists for two reasons:
1. The Sophists debased philosophy
2. The Sophists sold their teaching to whoever could pay, not just the Aristocracy
Sophists were on a sliding scale, but preached cultural and ethical relativism and ethical skepticism. The worst held ethical nihilism as a viewpoint.
Protagoras (490-420 BC)
- Agnostic
- Ethical relativist
While Protagoras was a relativist and Sophist he did garner some respect from Plato and Socrates, which is more than the cynical Callicles in the Gorgias got.
The Meno:
Concludes that virtue cannot be taught, it must be recalled.
"For Plato, knowledge is something we are already born with, and so 'learning' is simply forcing this knowledge to resurface into our conscious minds" (Robinson, 44).
Learning is anamnesis - recalling something imparted from the divine to the pre-existant souls of men.
The Republic:
Thrasymachus argues that society and the state are artificial constructs to limit the natural state of men.
Thrasymachus' views on morality predicted the views of Nietzsche and Marx.
Glaucon has a very negative view of humanity and posits a psychological egoist viewpoint. Humans are vicious, predatory beasts. Thomas Hobbes adopted this view and advocated strong governments to enforce morality.
Plato chooses not to argue against this as "psychological egoist explanations of all human behavior usually tend to be self-confirming and difficult to refute (Robinson, 60).
Saturday, November 12, 2016
Cuckoldage - Book Report
Cuckoldage
-Dates from 1715
So if the dating by the Penguin authors and commentators is correct, Voltaire was roughly 21 years old when he wrote this really short fiction. The commentators note that it shows the authors gift for parody even when he was young. In this work Voltaire turns a fairly conventional story about the gods into something very unconventional. Its sacrilegious nature demonstrates what the commentators state as a bit of a shot across the brow towards Christianity, "Already, if only by implication, Christian values are dismissed in favour of a pagan world of free love" (ix)
The Literary Stuffs I like:
When talking about Vulcan (the blacksmith of the gods), Voltaire pens the line, "He filled the house with his din; cares and sorrows racked his spirit, jealous suspicions hammered at his brain" (Voltaire, 3).
The jealous of Vulcan drove his brain to give birth to Cuckoldage. Cuckoldage then goes about seducing married men's wives. As such, men must give devotion to this god: "whether from necessity or prudence, we must offer him our devotions, our incense and our candles. Married or unmarried, whether one acts or lives in fear, one must ever court his favors" (Voltaire, 4).
Voltaire expresses his love for Iris, the goddess of the rainbow. But, he decries that love now that she has been enslaved by a contract (God's covenant to Noah). Prior to that enslavement he only invoked the god of love. But now, because contracts lock up everything, Hymen is in charge of love. (Hymen presided over weddings). Now, Voltaire must invoke Cuckoldage "because he is the only god in whom I can believe" (Voltaire, 4).
That's some pretty dark humor on marriage and faithfulness.
-Dates from 1715
So if the dating by the Penguin authors and commentators is correct, Voltaire was roughly 21 years old when he wrote this really short fiction. The commentators note that it shows the authors gift for parody even when he was young. In this work Voltaire turns a fairly conventional story about the gods into something very unconventional. Its sacrilegious nature demonstrates what the commentators state as a bit of a shot across the brow towards Christianity, "Already, if only by implication, Christian values are dismissed in favour of a pagan world of free love" (ix)
The Literary Stuffs I like:
When talking about Vulcan (the blacksmith of the gods), Voltaire pens the line, "He filled the house with his din; cares and sorrows racked his spirit, jealous suspicions hammered at his brain" (Voltaire, 3).
The jealous of Vulcan drove his brain to give birth to Cuckoldage. Cuckoldage then goes about seducing married men's wives. As such, men must give devotion to this god: "whether from necessity or prudence, we must offer him our devotions, our incense and our candles. Married or unmarried, whether one acts or lives in fear, one must ever court his favors" (Voltaire, 4).
Voltaire expresses his love for Iris, the goddess of the rainbow. But, he decries that love now that she has been enslaved by a contract (God's covenant to Noah). Prior to that enslavement he only invoked the god of love. But now, because contracts lock up everything, Hymen is in charge of love. (Hymen presided over weddings). Now, Voltaire must invoke Cuckoldage "because he is the only god in whom I can believe" (Voltaire, 4).
That's some pretty dark humor on marriage and faithfulness.
Micromegas & Other Short Fictions Assessment
I finished Micromégas and Other Short Fictions by Voltaire about five days ago. Generally my assessments on this blog about books I have finished have been mercifully brief. But, my obsession with Voltaire demands something a bit more.
I rated this book (a Penguin) with three stars. I noted on my review that "Some people on this app labeled Candide as dated and thus, out of touch with the current character of this age. I wholeheartedly disagreed and argued the timeless nature of the work. Had they argued that some of the fictions in this book were the case I would have still argued agains them, but not as wholeheartedly. As an anthology this book is great. Voltaire is incredibly easy to read, profound and cuts to the bone. But because it is an anthology there are better and worse stories in it. Some of the stories demand you read the footnotes, while others can be simply enjoyed free of historical context.
Pot-Poori and the Account of the illness, confession, death and apparition of the Jesuit Breathier necessitate a glance back at the footnotes. Without reading the footnotes Pot-Pouri reads a bit like surrealist fiction (I'm not entirely convince it isn't). Micromégas and The History of the Travels of Scarmentado can just stand alone as humorous satire without demanding one know exactly what is being satirized. If you like Candide, you'll enjoy this. If you love Candide (as I do), you'll really enjoy this. If you don't like Candide, you're wrong."
This would be about the end of most of my assessments. Then I would write a few quotes that I found interesting or highlight some passages that I think would be useful later in my studies. But, since I want to really get to know Voltaire, I'm going to a story-by-story assessment. So, I'll be posting over and over on this book. But, it won't be a back-to-back-to-back sort of endeavor. I'll be doing it to break up the dry copying of my notes on Chalmer's What is this thing called science? Based on my handwriting and notes from 2006 I enjoyed the work. But, at the moment I'm not reliving my excitement...
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Introducing Plato (A)
(Originally written November 10, 2016 in Book 26)
Introducing Plato
Dave Robinson & Judy Groves
- Born in 427 in Athens, "Probably the most civilized place in the world" (Robinson, 4). The actual city of Athens was small enough for everyone to know everyone.
"Socrates maintained that philosophy couldn't be taught, because it was really an attitude of mind rather than a body of knowledge" (Robinson, 8).
Plato left Athens in disgust when Socrates was executed, traveling around the Mediterranean before settling in Sicily where he met Dion. Dion would eventually get Plato locked up in Syracuse for being his advocate. After Dion was assassinated during a coup attempt Plato gave up actual politics.
Ancient Greeks laid the foundations for Western society; but, were very different to modern Westerners in a few aspects:
1) They were much more tribal than individualistic
2) Teleological viewpoint: "Everything in the world aimed towards an ultimate purpose or design" (Robinson, 15).
3) Religion - the Greek gods were not very worship worthy. Sacrifices were made to appease them. Ethics and political values were held from outside sources rather than religious ones.
What makes the ancient Greeks modern is that they had a critical and investigative mind.
Plato was worried about the survival of Athens as an independent city-state in the post-Peloponnesian War system. Of course, there were the outside threats (Sparta and Persia). But there was an internal threat as well - the Sophists. Plato's Republic was a warning against this danger.
Plato was primarily influenced by Pythagoras, Socrates and Heraclitus.
Pythagoras was a monist of sorts, only his underlying substance was mathematics: everything was numbers.
Pythagoras was responsible for the Greek belief that knowledge had to be universal, permanent, obtained by reason and uncorrupted by the senses.
Heraclitus stated everything changes. The world is in eternal process. Heraclitus' skepticism about empirical knowledge reinforced the rationalism of Pythagoras.
Socrates was different though. He was more interested in how man should act rather than the heady investigations of the underlying stuffs of the natural world.
For Socrates, "the teleological purpose of human beings is to question everything and join in debate with others, in order to get as close as possible to the truth" (Robinson, 23).
Socrates was cautious, but not a skeptic.
For Socrates, "goodness was a kind of knowledge somehow encoded into the structure of the universe itself - there were moral facts. Once these were known, it would be impossible for anyone to do bad things. This means that a wicked man is merely one who is ignorant" (Robinson, 25).
The difference between the acutal Socrates and the Platonic Socrates is difficult to know because Socrates didn't write. It is assumed that the early Platonic dialogues were Socrates' actual thoughts while the middle and later dialogues were more of Plato's individual ideas.
The Euthyphro:
A discussion in the distinction between morality based on religious belief and morality based on philosophical reasoning.
"Only when people turn away from the dogmatism and irrationality of religion can true moral philosophy begin" (Robinson, 29).
The Apology:
An account of Socrates' speeches at his trial.
Socrates claims it is his duty as a man to consider what he is doing, is he acting rightly or wrongly; is he behaving morally?
The Crito:
An account of Socrates' refusal to escape his death sentence for ethical/political reasons.
The Phaedo:
An account of Socrates' death.
Arguments for the immortality of the soul.
"He ironically points out that philosophers have always been an ascetic bunch, uninterested in bodily pleasures, and so, 'half-dead' anyway. Philosophical thinking is a process of freeing the soul from the body: death is merely further separation" (Robinson, 34).
Death comes from life; thus, life must come from death.
Knowledge, for Plato, had to be stable like mathematics to evade the Heraclitian flux and the relativism of the skeptic. Plato acknowledged that truth existed, but knew it was hard to get as humans.
Introducing Plato
Dave Robinson & Judy Groves
- Born in 427 in Athens, "Probably the most civilized place in the world" (Robinson, 4). The actual city of Athens was small enough for everyone to know everyone.
"Socrates maintained that philosophy couldn't be taught, because it was really an attitude of mind rather than a body of knowledge" (Robinson, 8).
Plato left Athens in disgust when Socrates was executed, traveling around the Mediterranean before settling in Sicily where he met Dion. Dion would eventually get Plato locked up in Syracuse for being his advocate. After Dion was assassinated during a coup attempt Plato gave up actual politics.
Ancient Greeks laid the foundations for Western society; but, were very different to modern Westerners in a few aspects:
1) They were much more tribal than individualistic
2) Teleological viewpoint: "Everything in the world aimed towards an ultimate purpose or design" (Robinson, 15).
3) Religion - the Greek gods were not very worship worthy. Sacrifices were made to appease them. Ethics and political values were held from outside sources rather than religious ones.
What makes the ancient Greeks modern is that they had a critical and investigative mind.
Plato was worried about the survival of Athens as an independent city-state in the post-Peloponnesian War system. Of course, there were the outside threats (Sparta and Persia). But there was an internal threat as well - the Sophists. Plato's Republic was a warning against this danger.
Plato was primarily influenced by Pythagoras, Socrates and Heraclitus.
Pythagoras was a monist of sorts, only his underlying substance was mathematics: everything was numbers.
Pythagoras was responsible for the Greek belief that knowledge had to be universal, permanent, obtained by reason and uncorrupted by the senses.
Heraclitus stated everything changes. The world is in eternal process. Heraclitus' skepticism about empirical knowledge reinforced the rationalism of Pythagoras.
Socrates was different though. He was more interested in how man should act rather than the heady investigations of the underlying stuffs of the natural world.
For Socrates, "the teleological purpose of human beings is to question everything and join in debate with others, in order to get as close as possible to the truth" (Robinson, 23).
Socrates was cautious, but not a skeptic.
For Socrates, "goodness was a kind of knowledge somehow encoded into the structure of the universe itself - there were moral facts. Once these were known, it would be impossible for anyone to do bad things. This means that a wicked man is merely one who is ignorant" (Robinson, 25).
The difference between the acutal Socrates and the Platonic Socrates is difficult to know because Socrates didn't write. It is assumed that the early Platonic dialogues were Socrates' actual thoughts while the middle and later dialogues were more of Plato's individual ideas.
The Euthyphro:
A discussion in the distinction between morality based on religious belief and morality based on philosophical reasoning.
"Only when people turn away from the dogmatism and irrationality of religion can true moral philosophy begin" (Robinson, 29).
The Apology:
An account of Socrates' speeches at his trial.
Socrates claims it is his duty as a man to consider what he is doing, is he acting rightly or wrongly; is he behaving morally?
The Crito:
An account of Socrates' refusal to escape his death sentence for ethical/political reasons.
The Phaedo:
An account of Socrates' death.
Arguments for the immortality of the soul.
"He ironically points out that philosophers have always been an ascetic bunch, uninterested in bodily pleasures, and so, 'half-dead' anyway. Philosophical thinking is a process of freeing the soul from the body: death is merely further separation" (Robinson, 34).
Death comes from life; thus, life must come from death.
Knowledge, for Plato, had to be stable like mathematics to evade the Heraclitian flux and the relativism of the skeptic. Plato acknowledged that truth existed, but knew it was hard to get as humans.
Criticism of the Forms
(Originally written November 10, 2016 in Book 26)
The Classical Mind
W.T. Jones
Chapter 5 - Plato: The Special Sciences
Criticism of the Theory of Forms
The problem is how things of this world interact with the eternal forms to gain reality. It is difficult to see how Plato's spatio-temporal world is not just mere appearance.
Plato even suggests in the Parmenides that the notion of participation is confused.
Plato's attack on the theory of forms in Parmenides shows just how intellectually honest Plato was.
"He believed that the truth, insofar as men can attain it, emerges in the thrust and counter-thrust of argument conducted jointly by truth seekers" (Jones, 207). Plato's whole career through the dialogues was an exercise in truth-seeking.
Platonism moves on the assumption (according to Platonic Physics) that everything corporeal is a combination of the elements (fire, earth, water and air). Thus, there doesn't need to be a form for "mud" or "hair". Hair exists as a combination of the elements which are participating in the eternal form of each element.
Participation is the big hole in Plato's theory. He described participation as being akin to an object and its shadow. But this analogy breaks down because the relationship between an object is spatiotemporal and forms exist outside of time and space.
The problem for Plato is how to bridge the gap between the physical world which would be unknowable if they are not objects of the form (because of the problem of permanence) and the form world, which is knowable; but, if there is no participation then it too is unintelligible.
Plato bridged this gap with his notion of "psyche". The "psyche" (soul) was capable of knowing the eternal forms. Psyche contained the mind, which can knwo forms. Psyche also contained the passions (emotions) which are in tune with the physical world. Hence the psyche, contained in every man was the bridge between the form world and the sensible one.
But this creates only a complicating duality in the psyche itself.
He held that knowledge, at its best, trancends the conceptual communication modes.
Plato, in his work, was not totally systematic. But he provided a framework for Aristotle to work in a more unified way.
The Classical Mind
W.T. Jones
Chapter 5 - Plato: The Special Sciences
Criticism of the Theory of Forms
The problem is how things of this world interact with the eternal forms to gain reality. It is difficult to see how Plato's spatio-temporal world is not just mere appearance.
Plato even suggests in the Parmenides that the notion of participation is confused.
Plato's attack on the theory of forms in Parmenides shows just how intellectually honest Plato was.
"He believed that the truth, insofar as men can attain it, emerges in the thrust and counter-thrust of argument conducted jointly by truth seekers" (Jones, 207). Plato's whole career through the dialogues was an exercise in truth-seeking.
Platonism moves on the assumption (according to Platonic Physics) that everything corporeal is a combination of the elements (fire, earth, water and air). Thus, there doesn't need to be a form for "mud" or "hair". Hair exists as a combination of the elements which are participating in the eternal form of each element.
Participation is the big hole in Plato's theory. He described participation as being akin to an object and its shadow. But this analogy breaks down because the relationship between an object is spatiotemporal and forms exist outside of time and space.
The problem for Plato is how to bridge the gap between the physical world which would be unknowable if they are not objects of the form (because of the problem of permanence) and the form world, which is knowable; but, if there is no participation then it too is unintelligible.
Plato bridged this gap with his notion of "psyche". The "psyche" (soul) was capable of knowing the eternal forms. Psyche contained the mind, which can knwo forms. Psyche also contained the passions (emotions) which are in tune with the physical world. Hence the psyche, contained in every man was the bridge between the form world and the sensible one.
But this creates only a complicating duality in the psyche itself.
He held that knowledge, at its best, trancends the conceptual communication modes.
Plato, in his work, was not totally systematic. But he provided a framework for Aristotle to work in a more unified way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)